Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90684 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41686 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2016 01:37:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2016 01:37:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bishop.bettini@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bishop.bettini@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bishop.bettini@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.52 mail-wm0-f52.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.52] ([74.125.82.52:34469] helo=mail-wm0-f52.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B3/03-20254-6D14C965 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u188so85659969wmu.1 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:37:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lYCq9j5tvr/s5P/OZB6zvbkl8nPQzaIP7Mz2XhUCIJM=; b=XrBWBnzGFk+nf28S4MrZOdX3SKVwL0PULlUxIRXwJ4qOKNfU7kpCv6772zLLQMphrp CjWi5zgX16kqPdJF4/rZQ+nC7uPEd/J0miNZ9Oci1L1wcnTwTk+tpt4pqA3IZ44gRXdQ eEbgcGxdJAxQwGoj15vo8PV/Z3p1BzTcySOcn66NwsLELvLPmqZp1Tyj4gVmrJP45O6U pQ4V4MRIj4amqji7+BYQ+Wy+T+hxYaCc2OjJbs+UImKbCxWDB1DsLMYrCFacTgeE21+5 2/mCghSw6lEw7asRhranXjSnj6skMnQHiuYqTwLGlLtZxxGVOKD8GCD0lZJwzbnu5/vV pI5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lYCq9j5tvr/s5P/OZB6zvbkl8nPQzaIP7Mz2XhUCIJM=; b=AoJ8Sh45TExRMHE/qjSRavFZtJKNQwEqhwg0+7jOWNZizCjRfT5FNTzq7M1I5ggNDQ M6hzgO4vkU8waBNAxykNMwa8vox5F9sf8cHF+o4M2trxL34WE7Mza7cNlUXhwo2HWZvC owi+8N2M+tu+QvPaH+SexpOBJ6Q3uY4npU0yVxNHlRdqyIZo976Qa/k01knbCRo7BOYn wJc6UUIAgiMh7gUJX3h8cdy2KOeEwQbSfiiulWUVLgGM+9Ce0ncE61eeg5lTf84OPE3f 1R/T3/RWJ1O1JGkHJIFCeZ/qOW/wqWrcelFRtxmFbun8EUAk/twGZcbXKXsCVDVxXQ3m /gjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknBavmIaHtHND+kjiN4jsylV0V4AWvV2PU1Vtus8NlVruhz4AiLMH2m0PEpq+7X9u/qpenIoDdbWRcbigGx/03uhCaHg== X-Received: by 10.194.209.129 with SMTP id mm1mr23857930wjc.47.1453081043968; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:37:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: bishop@php.net Sender: bishop.bettini@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.205.10 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:36:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41AF69F5-B810-4F93-9BAE-B019AEF69CC8@zend.com> References: <8B865D2A-6762-430D-9EA1-9B693DE8E8C3@zort.net> <56948002.1080802@gmail.com> <56958530.2090903@gmail.com> <5696A315.9020509@thefsb.org> <5696A98B.3060907@garfieldtech.com> <41AF69F5-B810-4F93-9BAE-B019AEF69CC8@zend.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:36:54 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ypkkqpzyuLR7MW55Ha3KwTUBmNk Message-ID: To: Andi Gutmans Cc: Stig Bakken , Zeev Suraski , Larry Garfield , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a840a74a6fe052991cbeb Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines -- "let's proceed to ideas" From: bishop@php.net (Bishop Bettini) --047d7b3a840a74a6fe052991cbeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: > On 1/14/16, 7:47 AM, "stig.bakken@gmail.com on behalf of Stig Bakken" < > stig.bakken@gmail.com on behalf of stig@stigbakken.com> wrote: > > >I agree whole-heartedly with Zeev here! > > > >Anyone who has a clue about organizational psychology will tell you to > >focus on what you want more of, not on what you want to eliminate. Heck= , > >anyone who is a parent today should understand this intuitively. > > > >The main focus of a CoC should be positive, describing or even giving > >examples of respectful behavior, that way people are guided towards > >"wanted" behavior, instead of having to figure it out by process of > >elimination from a list of what NOT to do. Granted, there is such a thi= ng > >as common sense, but it's not always that common, so providing positive > >guidance is effective. > > > >Several people have suggested splitting the RFC into two: one for the Co= C > >itself (which should be easier to rally around), and another for how > >to deal with problems. I think this is a very rational approach, it > allows > >us to learn from experience with the CoC as formulated before setting up > >any kind of tribunal or banning system which could backfire badly in > >various ways. > > > > I agree with Stig and it mirrors what=E2=80=99s happening in psychology -= less > carrot and stick and more focused on positive reinforcement and > expectations. > I also question whether the RFC process is supposed to even address such > issues. > The RFC process exists to vote on product related issues (features, EOL, > BC breakage, =E2=80=A6). It feels weird to me to use it for such an initi= ative. > > But going with Stig=E2=80=99s suggestion, I think it=E2=80=99d be nice to= work on a > consensus-based (not RFC-based) guideline of the kind of positive behavio= rs > we expect from people on internals@. > Yes, let's first answer the question "What positive environment do we want to have?" Here's an excerpt from *Elephpant Etiquette*, an alternative take on a "code of conduct": *As a contributor, you also represent PHP and are responsible for...* - *Your words: * - *Be understanding* - *Be polite* - *Be concise* - *Speak honestly with constructive language* - *Discuss the position, not the person* - *Your behavior: * - *Actively listen to those who are speaking* - *Affirm what you hear* - *Remain calm (strive for equanimity)* - *Keep your voice down (NO CAPS)* - *Stay out of other's personal space* - *Heed the advice of community moderators* Full text. --047d7b3a840a74a6fe052991cbeb--