Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90622
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL=_i_nZZQ74BVzy-4+XuPP72_U2ynNRDz5p0yEVNbd3x=ieeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <373698cabe053cb9bec8e1f6dc969906@mail.gmail.com>
	<BY2PR02MB298CD3F862A71149FB29857ACCB0@BY2PR02MB298.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAL=_i_mR9ue7W_=zZX19Zm3XY1kPaJfoho2U3ZdExNPXWQwN8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU436-SMTP1486256AA36AFDB5A00EDABE2CB0@phx.gbl>
	<BY2PR02MB29887B1092A73C5458ACE0FACCB0@BY2PR02MB298.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAL=_i_nZZQ74BVzy-4+XuPP72_U2ynNRDz5p0yEVNbd3x=ieeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:24:33 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4pd4=XwiqYdCrieGZdqPASwTwTf59ESMYyp8aSO8MQQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>
Cc: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c256b68fe3a605293a7109
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] PHP 5's Support Timeline
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11c256b68fe3a605293a7109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Jan 13, 2016 10:42 PM, "Joe Watkins" <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote:
>
> > The way the RFC the choices are going to be interpreted was presented
> ahead of time, was available throughout the entire discussion period, and
> very clearly so:
>
> So what !?
>
> The terms are clearly biased towards the longest support period if "no, I
> don't want to extend support period" is going to be taken to mean "yes,
> extend the support period using the longest option" ...
>
> Whatever, the options don't make sense ...

Why I change my vote from no to extend to yes and take the shorter options.

It would have been better to have all options clearly exposed.
> Cheers
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bob Weinand [mailto:bobwei9@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:16 PM
> > > To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
> > > Cc: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>; PHP internals
> > > <internals@lists.php.net>
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] PHP 5's Support Timeline
> > >
> > > I agree,
> > >
> > > no votes should be meaning  "I want as less as possible support".
> > > Counting it that way would make it up for a tie and us choosing the
most
> > > restrictive schedule as a result.
> > > (Interpreting it like "you need 50%+1 of the total to get it extended
so
> > far".)
> > >
> > > Hence Security Support until Dec 31 2017.
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > The way the RFC the choices are going to be interpreted was presented
> > ahead of time, was available throughout the entire discussion period,
and
> > very clearly so:
> > "In case the majority chooses to extend the lifetime of PHP 5.6 (>50%) -
> > then the option garnering more votes between the two proposed timelines
> > would win."
> >
> > I'm not sure what the situation would have been had we truly had a 23/23
> > split, probably a revote or an extended voting period, but the current
> > situation is very well defined under the RFC terms.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Zeev
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >

--001a11c256b68fe3a605293a7109--