Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90616 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39658 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2016 15:50:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jan 2016 15:50:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=neclimdul@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=neclimdul@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: neclimdul@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.41 mail-qg0-f41.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.41] ([209.85.192.41:35150] helo=mail-qg0-f41.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 51/01-34116-06276965 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:50:57 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id o11so457225123qge.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:50:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5pQTRJcACB1fEEA3AMV7sJD1c9/6vllRjP5OpQ18kng=; b=zvKg9QfO7QjP8fg+v47RopUFNMAZoirCX6D0nYLBN/OjbgoHhx6fay6MqBsI+ez1nq dK17Hj08rPxTcrnOxN4PnV/Td5sCb2otOho+Cy8KS91SHS7BOtS9oQ4N42i3J+Rr0lBa EIPJhqA3FYDLwKmGICppINu9hsIBzyqK/d8lmWvKpVsu1elvEfN0XHQjeaPA0AVsvNKn SGkz/k5x8mBcjYi6B4Q70Xtuq0VIs/rpvShfZtF9dG9Uuz/FlNH71jV0InLwCKTWUViG PbZ71QShXntZwxdhkuNp4YrvBwaqeT6BCRmV+sfAEtCtRVJsWqdCnvk2YuPB0Ilfy3iT 5eHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5pQTRJcACB1fEEA3AMV7sJD1c9/6vllRjP5OpQ18kng=; b=jmKjXpqzE81mneJVj4PINQXhAVxrh0NoFTqILda+KjhzswgOB4Ee0lk8j8l8bqUGWv /EtLeUQpLw0OUwBLPI3E0Q5Pk199A4NtV9/GmjAVb2vGIKeCYoiZCnEtAmEXl4fY26IK RgyoU3PmjPSlngK5dhpK8CsdugCMX0i/AzbJ6BJSu3nugYaIGZOsXmo3S1nqKSHuGBXZ ZrzKitvRqNXQexynPQFqYYAXejmEjrE9iJbmdY7LBxoxUay9cb9ZQ5zpf7DQ0izn6aAu okorZ0L3M1X3ZgrlYGPBppgL9eoHb0o0qDsw+0efuNIXCF+B0BSKAxA8tP117bPSgdul bswA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUcexiRfGIms1IbVfHFCAhCtdtnxpLAE53PS1q15wraqF3xtLo9JmZF1mjZQL8pP1yaD2t20sMEsnuKR+iqcQD3rqZdw== X-Received: by 10.140.175.7 with SMTP id v7mr11718635qhv.103.1452700253394; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:50:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8B865D2A-6762-430D-9EA1-9B693DE8E8C3@zort.net> <56948002.1080802@gmail.com> <2011571282.3259.fd941ca0-f3d1-4b3c-8747-f8166ff46b39.open-xchange@ox.myrasec.de> <1440796552.3268.fd941ca0-f3d1-4b3c-8747-f8166ff46b39.open-xchange@ox.myrasec.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:50:44 +0000 Message-ID: To: John Bafford , Adam Howard , Sascha Schumann Cc: Pierre Joye , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a29ea919e3205293922ab Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Back to the code (was Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines (WAS: Adopt Code of Conduct)) From: neclimdul@gmail.com (James Gilliland) --001a113a29ea919e3205293922ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm pretty sure everyone here has ignored emails before. A CoC is pretty darn important(in my opinion) but if you've decided the discussion isn't useful to you, just add a filter or just don't open the emails. Its not that hard. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:52 AM John Bafford wrote: > Adam, Sascha, > > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 08:53, Adam Howard wrote: > > > > Well, I'm glad someone is in agreement. I really wish we'd get back to > the actual code. Because if not, I do think perhaps PHP Internals as > outlived the email format and should migrate to a forum format. I think = I > and many others did not subscribe to a mailing list for this type of > argument and at this point it is becoming hard to follow, assume you were > interested in it. > > > > This little link http://www.php.net/unsub.php to unsubscribe is the > last report, but if this all we're going to keep arguing about, it sure > isn't going to encourage newbies, let alone long-timers such as myself. > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Sascha Schumann < > sascha.schumann@myrasecurity.com> wrote: > > > On January 12, 2016 at 7:05 PM Adam Howard > wrote: > > > > > > Can we please move on past this and get back to actual code. Because > if > > > not, perhaps PHP Internals has outgrown the email format and should > migrate > > > to a forum type format. > > > > Agreed. > > This is almost exactly the point I was trying to make. > > There is a serious problem with the conversation on internals, and the > immediate reaction is, =E2=80=9Cthere=E2=80=99s no problem, this is a dis= traction, stop > talking about this and talk about something else=E2=80=9D. > > Even if you didn=E2=80=99t *mean* that, that=E2=80=99s what was heard. > > > In one email, and one =E2=80=9Cme too=E2=80=9D follow-up you=E2=80=99ve: > > * attempted to silence an important discussion > * suggested that that the opinion held (and Fran=C3=A7ois=E2=80=99 questi= on) is not > worthy of discussion > * distracted the discussion with an unusable suggestion [* see below] > * provided nothing constructive to help actually solve the problem > * reinforced the notion that nothing is wrong and everything is fine. > > THIS is toxic internals. > > > Let me elaborate on the third point, particularly the distracted and > unusable bits: > > You make the assertion that this conversation is an indication that > php-internals has outgrown email and should migrate platforms. And you > propose an alternative. > > But you don=E2=80=99t explain *why* you think that this conversation has = outgrown > email, and even more importantly, you don=E2=80=99t you don=E2=80=99t act= ually explain > *why* a forum format would be an improvement. > > I=E2=80=99m not saying that a forum *couldn=E2=80=99t* be an improvement.= But without you > giving any supporting argument, you=E2=80=99ve given nothing concrete tha= t anyone > can have a discussion about. It=E2=80=99s not actively helping to solve t= he > problem. It=E2=80=99s just more noise that serves to make people think th= eir > comments don=E2=80=99t matter. (For the record: I don=E2=80=99t like foru= ms. And I really > don=E2=80=99t see how forums would solve the culture problem. But me sayi= ng that, > and only that, is just as constructive as you saying only that we should > switch to one.) > > So, your suggestion is unusable, because it provides nothing constructive > or actionable; and it is a distraction because the platform we use to tal= k > is *entirely* irrelevant to how people hold conversations on that platfor= m, > and rather than discussing the problem, you try to talk about something > completely unrelated instead. > > > I didn=E2=80=99t sign up for internals looking to deal with this either. = But there > is a problem, and it is keeping me from actually contributing code. And > I=E2=80=99ve been sitting on the sidelines here for a *long* time. I=E2= =80=99m trying to > make it so that newbies feel welcome to contribute. I=E2=80=99m trying to= make it > so that the old-timers who have reduced their participation feel like the= y > can come back and be productive again. > > I would *love* to talk about code now. I wish we didn=E2=80=99t have to t= alk about > this. But silencing the conversation and wishing the problem away doesn= =E2=80=99t > fix the the giant elephpant in the room. It just *makes it worse*. > > -John > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --001a113a29ea919e3205293922ab--