Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90563 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4467 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2016 16:00:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2016 16:00:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:22957] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/42-27877-A2325965 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:00:46 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.240.16.115]) (Authenticated sender: flaupretre@free.fr) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A023C4B01CD; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:59:22 +0100 (CET) To: Dan Ackroyd , Andreas Heigl References: <5690BCE6.6010908@gmail.com> <569182FD.6070404@gmail.com> <56918458.1070101@gmail.com> <5691D2EA.1050808@gmail.com> <5692307D.5050900@lsces.co.uk> <56925977.1040801@dennis.birkholz.biz> <5693C027.4070804@eliw.com> <5694D270.3050109@dennis.birkholz.biz> <56950882.7020008@eliw.com> <56950BB4.7040400@heigl.org> Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Message-ID: <56952323.5030201@php.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:00:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160111-0, 11/01/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Anonymous voting on wiki From: francois@php.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Laupretre?=) Le 12/01/2016 15:52, Dan Ackroyd a écrit : > François Laupretre wrote: > >> I would like the process to be amended to disable posting >> opinions/discussions about an RFC while the vote is open, >> considering there was enough time for that during the >> discussion phase. > > This is not a good idea. > > That won't actually make people discuss a proposal during the discussions phase. > > Instead people will be voting with the conversation about the proposal > not being complete. > > And then we'll be stuck with bad decisions. Well, it was just a suggestion. What I want to avoid is people jumping in when vote starts and asking for fundamental changes. Each time it happened to me, I had to stop the vote, modify the RFC, and restart the whole process. This also caused a pair of RFC not to be included in PHP 7. Some of them are even abandoned because I am quite tired of such behaviors. I'm OK with the discussion *going on* during the vote but I'm looking for a solution to a real problem. Regards François