Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90562
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.160.175 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPKYkKxk4MxhMOw7SY78c44rDqXB-EsVHNxKGeCSbUDo=TA7QQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8B865D2A-6762-430D-9EA1-9B693DE8E8C3@zort.net>
	<569506AC.2040503@thefsb.org>
	<CAPKYkKxk4MxhMOw7SY78c44rDqXB-EsVHNxKGeCSbUDo=TA7QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:57:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+kxMuQnzs2b6Ebmo8+tLvmapE0txrAgPzBf-fdvEc9700FHiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org>, John Bafford <jbafford@zort.net>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines (WAS:
 Adopt Code of Conduct)
From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd)

On 12 January 2016 at 15:27, Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally offered at least two emails with constructive feedback and
> alternative solutions. I never saw any reply or feedback to either one.

It's not possible for every email to be replied to in a conversation.
If they were, then the conversation would last forever.

> My take away from Anthony's last email is basically: "We're going to have a
> CoC whether you like it or not.

Then I believe you got the wrong point.

Anthony was saying that the conversation wasn't helping him to refine
the RFC to be more acceptable to the community; instead it was just
generating more tension and animosity, and that he would prefer to
suspend taking part in that conversation, until a more complete, and
hopefully acceptable RFC could be written.

At which point he would present the idea as a more polished RFC, which
hopefully would have a productive conversation.

cheers
Dan