Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90561
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain myrasecurity.com designates 185.85.3.44 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:51:11 +0100 (CET)
To: Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org>, Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com>, 
	John Bafford <jbafford@zort.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <1629137549.3251.fd941ca0-f3d1-4b3c-8747-f8166ff46b39.open-xchange@ox.myrasec.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAPKYkKxk4MxhMOw7SY78c44rDqXB-EsVHNxKGeCSbUDo=TA7QQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8B865D2A-6762-430D-9EA1-9B693DE8E8C3@zort.net>
 <569506AC.2040503@thefsb.org>
 <CAPKYkKxk4MxhMOw7SY78c44rDqXB-EsVHNxKGeCSbUDo=TA7QQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Medium
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines (WAS:
 Adopt Code of Conduct)
From: sascha.schumann@myrasecurity.com (Sascha Schumann)

> My take away from Anthony's last email is basically: "We're going to have a
> CoC whether you like it or not. You are welcome to offer feedback to make
> the CoC better after we propose it, but any feedback that says a CoC is bad
> will be viewed as non-constructive and ignored."

That would be foolish to assume.

> Everyone is so afraid that  people are afraid to get involved now because they
> don't feel "safe." 

Are there any reasons for that? 

> It's even worse if you have an individual on the committee with their own
> agenda that isn't operating in such a way.

The current proposed code of conduct looks exactly designed to benefit that
individuum.

Sascha
/oldtimer