Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90544
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain myrasecurity.com designates 185.85.3.44 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:23:26 +0100 (CET)
To: Peter Petermann <ppetermann80@gmail.com>
cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <CAKs572XWK_9dzUYfvRmJhFO1ysDc6O+jST7Y_DVd1eXmf4QjMg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601121322220.9545@myrasec.de>
References: <5690BCE6.6010908@gmail.com> <A1.30.14657.27961965@pb1.pair.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601111340270.3314@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl> <CAKs572XWK_9dzUYfvRmJhFO1ysDc6O+jST7Y_DVd1eXmf4QjMg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Anonymous voting on wiki
From: sascha.schumann@myrasecurity.com (Sascha Schumann)

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Peter Petermann wrote:

> >
> >
> > > This seems useful. I do wonder whether we should use by default for
> > > RFCs. It's interesting to see how different people vote, and knowing
> > > who voted which way means you can ask them what their objections were.
> > I have gotten these question in the past, and I think it's important to
> > be able to be asked why you made a specific choice.
> >
> > This. If someone votes he/she should be willing to stand for their vote -
> and should be approachable to talk about it.
> 
> secret voting is only necessary if there needs to be fear of repercussion,
> and i refuse to believe that we are at that point.

Agreed.

Who/what are people really afraid of?

Sascha