Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90543
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5690BCE6.6010908@gmail.com> <A1.30.14657.27961965@pb1.pair.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601111340270.3314@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601111340270.3314@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:55:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKs572XWK_9dzUYfvRmJhFO1ysDc6O+jST7Y_DVd1eXmf4QjMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0c6b6db0283052921ba90
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Anonymous voting on wiki
From: ppetermann80@gmail.com (Peter Petermann)

--047d7bf0c6b6db0283052921ba90
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
>
> > This seems useful. I do wonder whether we should use by default for
> > RFCs. It's interesting to see how different people vote, and knowing
> > who voted which way means you can ask them what their objections were.
> I have gotten these question in the past, and I think it's important to
> be able to be asked why you made a specific choice.
>
> This. If someone votes he/she should be willing to stand for their vote -
and should be approachable to talk about it.

secret voting is only necessary if there needs to be fear of repercussion,
and i refuse to believe that we are at that point.


> I disagree, I think it is important to know who voted for what in the
> end. Some accountability is good.
>
> That. times two.

regards,
PP
-- 
Peter Petermann
ProtonMail: ppetermann@protonmail.com (encrypted / based in .ch)
Email: ppetermann80@gmail.com - get my public PGP key from SKS Keyservers
PGP Key:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0E6DBD675836A5C7

--047d7bf0c6b6db0283052921ba90--