Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90542 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55718 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2016 11:39:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2016 11:39:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tpunt@hotmail.co.uk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tpunt@hotmail.co.uk; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.co.uk designates 157.55.1.167 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tpunt@hotmail.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 157.55.1.167 dub004-omc2s28.hotmail.com Received: from [157.55.1.167] ([157.55.1.167:61568] helo=DUB004-OMC2S28.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/73-32047-6F5E4965 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 06:39:35 -0500 Received: from DUB129-W33 ([157.55.1.138]) by DUB004-OMC2S28.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 03:39:31 -0800 X-TMN: [ZbwWMnthJbtj5raFcF7vRuWJ0YfHHAoa] X-Originating-Email: [tpunt@hotmail.co.uk] Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:39:30 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2016 11:39:31.0243 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6DAEFB0:01D14D2D] Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Number Format Separator From: tpunt@hotmail.co.uk (Thomas Punt) > Hi internals!=0A= >=0A= > I'd like to propose for the inclusion of a digit separator in PHP. This w= ill=0A= > help to promote the readability of numerical literals in code by enabling= for=0A= > the underscore character to be used in between digits.=0A= >=0A= > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/number_format_separator=0A= > PR: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1699=0A= =0A= Just bringing this back up to the top because of the recent influx in inter= nals=0A= activity. I'm hoping to put this to vote tomorrow=2C so if anyone has any= =0A= questions or problems with this RFC=2C then please let me know!=0A= =0A= -Tom =