Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90411 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64987 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2016 07:47:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2016 07:47:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.180 mail-ob0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.180] ([209.85.214.180:35724] helo=mail-ob0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A2/11-59249-92BB0965 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:47:53 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id xn1so97932437obc.2 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PPGiZSQnG/F/elCPqX3mDaMSbx0oJt9SgkIkztWUmc0=; b=cEew+b32tDXe/F/LYQcK7q9steNaBAIbHriTmQn08mCo9En+NKVtTvfBl5jlaI5K9n OqtKIceg/SMw3gy7pOJJscWNL8OBnwMghZfUqcaHkKhygq6Vl5EbCPC+NCQmWrZGWkYT sclug0Fm+G/etTOpClkLOhcVVks35mrhDFcIreIP9CEYlY7thOSj8QZGnAceJ1cN0r5j bbhlR7sxkjICt0ClB79VO5lUjaLSVxjZ6iqMuUd5q9zcuLmGCkY1OZUxCh29sx5g54j0 mHhLLuRUlBXMuYQNn1Evu4dpmb9qCcu1sEMDnuuf+vXvJazZycj9jg8cxM43fgOwgqvG smZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.227.104 with SMTP id rz8mr9929683oec.45.1452325669841; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.64.136 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.64.136 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:47:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5690B941.7080405@gmail.com> References: <910b145571b2c3e98338d54c0dd6a981@mail.gmail.com> <568FEBB2.4090001@gmail.com> <569007F5.3030004@gmail.com> <56902C5E.2020401@gmail.com> <5690A7E6.3010605@gmail.com> <5690B64F.9050405@gmail.com> <5690B941.7080405@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:47:49 +0700 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11368604a6403e0528e1eb08 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a11368604a6403e0528e1eb08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 9, 2016 2:39 PM, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote: > > Hi! > > > What I said is that these are two different points and should be > > discussed separately. Yes, it will be part of the RFc but talking many > > points at the same time is impossible. > > No, I don't think it's two different points, at least as far as punitive > functions go. If we omit the punitive aspect, then I'm completely fine > with the rest (CoC, mediation team) being discussed first, as I said. > But if you want discussing punishment powers, then we need to be clear > on this, IMHO. I am not saying we should ignore or omit anything. We simply cannot discuss everything in one shot. It is impossible. We have to divide into smaller topics with assumptions for the unknown. Then we can go back to improve previously discussed topics. > > Early points like the toc of the CoC can be discussed with assumptions. > > Assumptions like 'let say we trust the group to begin with". Then we can > > discuss how the group is chosen. For example. > > How the group is chosen - of course, but that's different issue from > what we were talking about. Yes, like content and actions are also different topics to be discussed separately. > > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalyshev@gmail.com --001a11368604a6403e0528e1eb08--