Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90410 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63428 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2016 07:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2016 07:39:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.49 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.49 mail-pa0-f49.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.49] ([209.85.220.49:33375] helo=mail-pa0-f49.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E9/B0-59249-749B0965 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:39:52 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id cy9so294243675pac.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:39:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yyRubV8RidHcBNo8+c1fruIqIXKWGbi+faJ0MXniTBE=; b=ai74aP9rlvZXqAlUDcGs4NTHnYq56yFivg+VdnQmTF+Th/+HMg3zj70nhXnn/jBh58 2f2KeBz5LeeQyFADBH2m6b3on5IKQZIRoE4gT/K1B7223rCv3SKI7ShIeJFNiQhwl62h O99f3f+qpir+sd3B1CBzBPNHJx1UIgO4RIgUET26q0G/hDiinNxbJT6H6ubj3tqSU86q IgAt85ukjHwL9+bb0bHboa2w+vJWtgLtLWZPKluQ3b6TzEPTt9YK6DnZRlKp1M55+cxq 7cTy96JyRUlXuUgJVHJiFLymJM6QTiNsGc8ivW7B39kNV7T7IRAP1/1ght1Rm96CObBl 6l5g== X-Received: by 10.66.102.97 with SMTP id fn1mr166543777pab.131.1452325188015; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:cdc2:e5f0:d43e:d04f:9263:93fb? ([2602:304:cdc2:e5f0:d43e:d04f:9263:93fb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3sm9264900pfb.64.2016.01.08.23.39.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:39:47 -0800 (PST) To: Pierre Joye References: <910b145571b2c3e98338d54c0dd6a981@mail.gmail.com> <568FEBB2.4090001@gmail.com> <569007F5.3030004@gmail.com> <56902C5E.2020401@gmail.com> <5690A7E6.3010605@gmail.com> <5690B64F.9050405@gmail.com> Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <5690B941.7080405@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:39:45 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > What I said is that these are two different points and should be > discussed separately. Yes, it will be part of the RFc but talking many > points at the same time is impossible. No, I don't think it's two different points, at least as far as punitive functions go. If we omit the punitive aspect, then I'm completely fine with the rest (CoC, mediation team) being discussed first, as I said. But if you want discussing punishment powers, then we need to be clear on this, IMHO. > Early points like the toc of the CoC can be discussed with assumptions. > Assumptions like 'let say we trust the group to begin with". Then we can > discuss how the group is chosen. For example. How the group is chosen - of course, but that's different issue from what we were talking about. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com