Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90377
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2732F2A4-51F7-42CC-A7E7-1EC7B26CDF97@gmail.com>
References: <BE0EB5B804BC488AAD1344BF9D3B9277@gmail.com>
	<66E04ACF-7363-4E47-BFFD-E380E5B1EA23@gmail.com>
	<CAL=_i_kspY_v0Z-WvPdUAc3-_YfNC_a=59nUrLuW65G97+qZTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<6D.39.21755.3576D865@pb1.pair.com>
	<1AD1B991-A3E5-4D6C-A532-5F0FCCC2ED61@gmail.com>
	<CAObuZdtKyJXVEAtJzvZENf+Da6S+BFCnXaErvmiHJXen9DCDmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<568D7C5D.9020405@php.net>
	<CAAyV7nFYYxZELZhgo_wrhr9u2+Lww1jQAw+3O=fGqLJJdg7GkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1e6a13607a3a1c8b20a4649f8a5ef767@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5BaogkrJ4H9o1x9ENWXOVqnAye8Oh535aTHOefMuJz6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<3AB5AA82-4F17-40C3-B8B5-33697A8DBEC2@gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6T14yr8UN1F0goY=7sme-iKgXLECSL7yiAqFLf_xPchw@mail.gmail.com>
	<FD56BF25-0825-4666-AEF9-06996E59C514@gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7nNuEQehisOZK3nC4AuafrahQbvLgZOGteR1jt4cWV_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<B1697F0F-883C-4D49-8CB6-4DF152662886@gmail.com>
	<8D90A4F6-4E3E-4283-B8E3-152E4707EF4E@moonspot.net>
	<568F4E81.1020205@garfieldtech.com>
	<2732F2A4-51F7-42CC-A7E7-1EC7B26CDF97@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:51:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAObuZdvd2JhFG2QKVbaGwqfc4gMAkJCSgGO7Xp1uCP7C2Hi--w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014935f432fc5e0528d63ee4
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: derokorian@gmail.com (Ryan Pallas)

--089e014935f432fc5e0528d63ee4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can trust
> to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but that are
> fair) that don't fall too far into "thought policing", in *any* direction?
> If not, then the community is already lost beyond all hope and we should
> all just give up now.  I do not believe that to be the case, at all.
>
> Too long spent in a position of power, and even the most fair can become
> unfair.
>
> As I have suggested before: *if* there is to be a response team, let it be
> randomly selected on per-reported-incident basis from the pool of voters.
> Then there is no possibility of a charge of continuing bias, and it
> distributes power among the pool, instead of concentrating it into a few
> members.
>
> Proponents of the response team: thoughts?
>

I would prefer to see the team picked for the next occurence immediately
after one happens. This way, if the resolution can be handled by just
having a calm conversation with the interested parties, then there is no
need to make it public. Instead, the mediators would say "A conflict has
occurred and a new team needs to be in place".

Or maybe something like 1 month duty at a time, but team membership may
last beyond a month, if no conflicts were had during that month. IE, you
get put on the team, you may "serve" for a year if no conflicts arise. Or
you may only server for a month, if a conflict does arrive (I think an
upper bounds when no conflicts may not be required, but should be
considered if this suggestion is taken to heart at all).


>
>
> --
> Paul M. Jones
> pmjones88@gmail.com
> http://paul-m-jones.com
>
> Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
>
> Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/sn1php
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--089e014935f432fc5e0528d63ee4--