Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90376
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BE0EB5B804BC488AAD1344BF9D3B9277@gmail.com> <66E04ACF-7363-4E47-BFFD-E380E5B1EA23@gmail.com>
 <CAL=_i_kspY_v0Z-WvPdUAc3-_YfNC_a=59nUrLuW65G97+qZTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6D.39.21755.3576D865@pb1.pair.com> <1AD1B991-A3E5-4D6C-A532-5F0FCCC2ED61@gmail.com>
 <CAObuZdtKyJXVEAtJzvZENf+Da6S+BFCnXaErvmiHJXen9DCDmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <568D7C5D.9020405@php.net> <CAAyV7nFYYxZELZhgo_wrhr9u2+Lww1jQAw+3O=fGqLJJdg7GkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1e6a13607a3a1c8b20a4649f8a5ef767@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU5BaogkrJ4H9o1x9ENWXOVqnAye8Oh535aTHOefMuJz6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <3AB5AA82-4F17-40C3-B8B5-33697A8DBEC2@gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6T14yr8UN1F0goY=7sme-iKgXLECSL7yiAqFLf_xPchw@mail.gmail.com>
 <FD56BF25-0825-4666-AEF9-06996E59C514@gmail.com> <CAEZPtU7nNuEQehisOZK3nC4AuafrahQbvLgZOGteR1jt4cWV_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <B1697F0F-883C-4D49-8CB6-4DF152662886@gmail.com> <8D90A4F6-4E3E-4283-B8E3-152E4707EF4E@moonspot.net>
 <568F4E81.1020205@garfieldtech.com> <2732F2A4-51F7-42CC-A7E7-1EC7B26CDF97@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2732F2A4-51F7-42CC-A7E7-1EC7B26CDF97@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:31:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPKYkKwZCeVLddO7zPQt6+XTb53t-4zfMe0MaEXj-y-mvBhJVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com>, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115edca16d26e0528d5f58e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler)

--089e0115edca16d26e0528d5f58e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can trust
> to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but that are
> fair) that don't fall too far into "thought policing", in *any* direction?
> If not, then the community is already lost beyond all hope and we should
> all just give up now.  I do not believe that to be the case, at all.
>
> Too long spent in a position of power, and even the most fair can become
> unfair.
>
> As I have suggested before: *if* there is to be a response team, let it be
> randomly selected on per-reported-incident basis from the pool of voters.
> Then there is no possibility of a charge of continuing bias, and it
> distributes power among the pool, instead of concentrating it into a few
> members.
>
> Proponents of the response team: thoughts?
>
>
>
I think it's the least bad way of doing something that is inherently bad,
at least among what has been proposed so far.


> --
> Paul M. Jones
> pmjones88@gmail.com
> http://paul-m-jones.com
>
> Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
>
> Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/sn1php
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
> --
-- Chase
chasepeeler@gmail.com

--089e0115edca16d26e0528d5f58e--