Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90375 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78385 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2016 17:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 2016 17:28:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pmjones88@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pmjones88@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.182 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pmjones88@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.182 mail-yk0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.182] ([209.85.160.182:33828] helo=mail-yk0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/54-55593-AB1FF865 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:28:26 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a85so291914358ykb.1 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:28:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=p8Tnz/mYp18zGV9ryRs6e99YG1zoRR4BCutqZz2ZIWQ=; b=aVMqrfMAGHVk4Kh4BEbdSJfg4cDPAM8wPjJV40t83f2Vhmm2EYRBl91q/EhToqkEfP QrKmdL4RjDgepK5YxcorviK7bLJTdh2QU/bLS7W00H4/yUJTTt+dmkoMDe2SUKWACZLo atmz611dmCMvHZoKhttWm871UwQbLI+KJcUsNkOtJSZW7T96Zs80+NlEAjbOfe4iGuqg HWSVlHRHeaRQLxtmpdp38z3woTPJb0FGXwjh7O037uwcfvWP1N3qDXq5s/NwERlxC68c idYsOAwRlf/8Kyd9bkdEZF6stD1j4xoaJT4l2elkPwHzS+BDXwdqNc0EPPgYv4NOGgn1 48vA== X-Received: by 10.129.51.214 with SMTP id z205mr91216894ywz.157.1452274103340; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2602:306:cecb:ae30:4591:3b50:4b8:75d1? ([2602:306:cecb:ae30:4591:3b50:4b8:75d1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r130sm89010862ywe.49.2016.01.08.09.28.22 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:28:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) In-Reply-To: <568F4E81.1020205@garfieldtech.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:28:22 -0600 Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <2732F2A4-51F7-42CC-A7E7-1EC7B26CDF97@gmail.com> References: <66E04ACF-7363-4E47-BFFD-E380E5B1EA23@gmail.com> <6D.39.21755.3576D865@pb1.pair.com> <1AD1B991-A3E5-4D6C-A532-5F0FCCC2ED61@gmail.com> <568D7C5D.9020405@php.net> <1e6a13607a3a1c8b20a4649f8a5ef767@mail.gmail.com> <3AB5AA82-4F17-40C3-B8B5-33697A8DBEC2@gmail.com> <8D90A4F6-4E3E-4283-B8E3-152E4707EF4E@moonspot.net> <568F4E81.1020205@garfieldtech.com> To: Larry Garfield X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: pmjones88@gmail.com ("Paul M. Jones") > On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield = wrote: >=20 > Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can = trust to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but = that are fair) that don't fall too far into "thought policing", in *any* = direction? If not, then the community is already lost beyond all hope = and we should all just give up now. I do not believe that to be the = case, at all. Too long spent in a position of power, and even the most fair can become = unfair. As I have suggested before: *if* there is to be a response team, let it = be randomly selected on per-reported-incident basis from the pool of = voters. Then there is no possibility of a charge of continuing bias, and = it distributes power among the pool, instead of concentrating it into a = few members. Proponents of the response team: thoughts? --=20 Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php