Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90312 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16799 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2016 20:31:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jan 2016 20:31:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.160.177 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.177 mail-yk0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.177] ([209.85.160.177:35176] helo=mail-yk0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/53-21405-41BCE865 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:31:17 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x67so342165260ykd.2 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:31:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tECZWJvEffJHTFY4mqCfokX+g9hnriDzy5y8md1qgnU=; b=ky41DnTLHK9XOI99eTdYFSuJ/mjkYQJr8JEkrlu2TLQ7Ws7LyoYLkJElIl+TPBP7e1 2/4Uet4nsJEUP4Ce/gpI70KR/vY89Rl98z8jZivL9I2dMlCyWzFz9qjFig1Oadnj1pux ZD6I2DEMa+7I3H43BEnUKYUzJ2QwWjwBHgVW6pt5J+JQGyseHlBTMbGW9KfPMAkmXzpN MZZZ9UfDykMhL6ZobiFJ/QJI6mhtSjHGcoFysVISYuFVaNkyavi+BJHaxHoLXWR8piWM cPvYDTQpXcT1ptvW4BbIfO/q/52jV9IBS0EtQRWueFdL5mf1YMaodEruX7pF50BuZ5ct 5dWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tECZWJvEffJHTFY4mqCfokX+g9hnriDzy5y8md1qgnU=; b=eoBhGPlAr0AdVuWwzBCG5LvLcGADZNHK9s95fUW5B5ILB2+hNoZ6LIFHPM1oQGVkkF qAWusOk1R570bo2w9AWEJYvi9eMsNsk/uMpVGVi1vMAw5E1fNIsOwesLXDsZIrurVVoK RIViG2Lpv4vp7VlwU6O2C5BbvMFup9u+19VbVHMKDGTGmEyOahF9emjtlFHTXus8hzDf gZ6ld5NBnP1epzchFJ79/Q9rntrxStjfY1ns4Jas996MpvioX9622cWZST7hEuF9GDOJ gDGP8q9nwagnkH4/Px+PbXfKv2SAW4XnINAVaNFTVlRTUwHqyBj6gqAwV3kWihy700c+ iEEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnO1iAx3bCcULrj6lOP8FC3P7l1Y2IQNUNL7OfggDxLSbrGOR6IT0cI7+8cOQwtxrEcEbHXkhc+QlTUAmhRyxs59FprQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.27.13 with SMTP id b13mr76041092ywb.133.1452198673222; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.83.131 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:31:12 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [2.99.233.57] In-Reply-To: <4594B7A8-D6A0-433A-9EAB-92C421E73EB9@gmail.com> References: <66E04ACF-7363-4E47-BFFD-E380E5B1EA23@gmail.com> <6D.39.21755.3576D865@pb1.pair.com> <1AD1B991-A3E5-4D6C-A532-5F0FCCC2ED61@gmail.com> <568D7C5D.9020405@php.net> <1e6a13607a3a1c8b20a4649f8a5ef767@mail.gmail.com> <3AB5AA82-4F17-40C3-B8B5-33697A8DBEC2@gmail.com> <0AFAA09D-0933-4C8D-91A4-307F9916D3AD@gmail.com> <2328961D-4B28-4EE7-8DDD-AD1F1A0A3617@gmail.com> <87E54FB2-7294-4CED-B969-46B086903E18@gmail.com> <4594B7A8-D6A0-433A-9EAB-92C421E73EB9@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:31:12 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Paul M. Jones" Cc: Pierre Joye , Anthony Ferrara , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 7 January 2016 at 20:12, Paul M. Jones wrote: > > If the activity in question rises to the level of filing a petition for = *and being granted* a restraining order, *then and only then* might the pro= ject have some responsibility to help enforce that order, since the project= itself may become subject to a lawsuit or other legal actions. (I am sati= sfied to read "employee" as "contributor/participant" and "employer" as "th= e project" in this case.) > > But anything less? No, the project's responsibility is only to enforce it= s policies on its own communication channels. So you're saying, any harassment that failed to meet a criminal criteria, wouldn't be acted upon. Any harassment where the person being harassed decides to just leave the project rather than seek a court order, wouldn't be acted upon. Fun-fact*, if I went round to someone's house, took some photos of it, maybe took some pictures of their family as well, and then sent them those pictures with the message "Hey, are you going to fix that bug that's important to me, or shall I come round to your house to discuss it in person?", none of that would reach a criminal matter, and so there would be nothing the PHP project could do about it. Don't get me wrong, that behaviour would be creepy as heck - but not anything the police or a court could do anything about. And you're suggesting that this is an acceptable situation. I think I'm done listening to you. cheers Dan *actual amounts of fun may vary.