Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90276 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48810 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2016 16:59:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jan 2016 16:59:00 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 92.66.168.50 unknown Received: from [92.66.168.50] ([92.66.168.50:8317] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/B5-21405-1599E865 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:58:59 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:58:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 92.66.168.50 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Libsodium From: phpdev@ehrhardt.nl (Jan Ehrhardt) Anthony Ferrara in php.internals (Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:14 -0500): >I agree with you in principle, but in this particular case I think >that there's enough justification considering how measurably bad >mcrypt is, and how little some people trust openssl. OTH, OpenSSL has made progress and the quality is improving as far as I can tell as a bystander. -- Jan