Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90243
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <568D7859.5000403@php.net>
References: <CAAyV7nFbngZ42qzbSFyveH+vsyir9QNtMJq8H=u9VqTBVBv5Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAyV7nGzsuhDSgenmLUjWPYiNfamcqCgvXpM4Sb30VECpTrHpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568C9ED7.30504@gmail.com> <CAAyV7nEnovW3YqmTjBnhtmAGhKiwYo1tYq_QHDYBgRNKNG61zQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568D4220.3050309@php.net> <CAESVnVob7SweHuHed3yx8uh4hBKtW9+=p9_eX6cgsbGBEAKYfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E.99.21755.1B96D865@pb1.pair.com> <568D7859.5000403@php.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:03:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPg3Xx+og-WDhAb3GsUJ1LYrQPcMTsnAUKf+7huPeOWvfFHOpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= <francois@php.net>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11407ee83183690528bac155
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: petercowburn@gmail.com (Peter Cowburn)

--001a11407ee83183690528bac155
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Just replying on the anonymous RFC votes side-topic.

On 6 January 2016 at 20:26, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre <francois@php.net> wrot=
e:

> Le 06/01/2016 20:23, Andrea Faulds a =C3=A9crit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sara Golemon wrote:
>>
>>> So, I'm all for a mediation team, but no sanction, even temporary,
>>>> without a
>>>> public vote.
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad you and I agree on this.
>>>
>>
>> There is the risk with public votes that whoever votes a particular way
>> gets harassed for the way they voted. While this doesn't happen very
>> much in technical discussions, I think there's a greater risk of that in
>> a vote on whether to sanction a person for unacceptable behaviour.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> That's another question. Ideally, votes should be anonymous, even on
> RFCs. Scalar type hints have proved that seeing other's vote may be a ver=
y
> bad thing.
>

This was tried once [1] and there was an immediate knee-jerk reaction [1]
which resulted in quickly removing the feature.  Maybe the winds have
changed between then and now?

[1] https://github.com/php/web-wiki/pull/1
[2] http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,848161


>
> And you're right: for a sanctioning vote, votes *must* be anonymous.
>
> Regards
>
> Fran=C3=A7ois
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--001a11407ee83183690528bac155--