Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90224 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89598 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2016 19:42:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2016 19:42:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.178 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.178 mail-pf0-f178.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.178] ([209.85.192.178:32878] helo=mail-pf0-f178.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 41/3C-21755-43E6D865 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:42:44 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q63so207957570pfb.0 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9gOlD1uvLGY5xKj1OLNom8MR/rzbwHIG/suJ0wdO9cE=; b=nT1zWydkBjzROFJNEfULyTJgKSN9f6fFQW8Cy0+Fb4czaFE7Dv5kKcjsz/xh/JPN1x lR6k08ThUb5Uu9UBVNU/PzmA+oY8dgluBBIDZLGiLHNfg6lJMuxra9fPKGgrwkD2JP4k SabZfJD7jUi7zAREh1tss5BMnpl2T3ZCvTDTl/BLEPnszRgKeDzyBPuZ6AvFoPGRZbPl 5bqyOYSGTjrV0xjravThqtO6ryl4Bfqs0Gam2JYFNeV2HBIpSXMqlhi4PSqYIA53T+YP gIC0xpK80aPshLe6ItM9KwciQwB8lZRpqvOcUrFIIdCpCjr4AYn1VA/hUhUD/faTwcQb A32g== X-Received: by 10.98.70.12 with SMTP id t12mr118947277pfa.38.1452109361220; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:cdc2:e5f0:556:9f3:56bd:73da? ([2602:304:cdc2:e5f0:556:9f3:56bd:73da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm142548462pat.7.2016.01.06.11.42.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:42:40 -0800 (PST) To: Andrea Faulds , internals@lists.php.net References: <568C9ED7.30504@gmail.com> <568D4220.3050309@php.net> <4E.99.21755.1B96D865@pb1.pair.com> X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568D6E2F.2010406@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:42:39 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E.99.21755.1B96D865@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > There is the risk with public votes that whoever votes a particular way > gets harassed for the way they voted. While this doesn't happen very > much in technical discussions, I think there's a greater risk of that in > a vote on whether to sanction a person for unacceptable behaviour. Votes itself can be secret (though we do not have a mechanism for it now, but I imagine we can find one), I think the idea is more that the voting process should be public - i.e. both available to the public - understood here as the same people now voting on RFCs - and conducted openly, with open discussion, etc. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com