Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90221
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain eliw.com designates 69.195.198.246 as permitted sender)
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAAyV7nFbngZ42qzbSFyveH+vsyir9QNtMJq8H=u9VqTBVBv5Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAyV7nGzsuhDSgenmLUjWPYiNfamcqCgvXpM4Sb30VECpTrHpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568C9ED7.30504@gmail.com>
 <CAAyV7nEnovW3YqmTjBnhtmAGhKiwYo1tYq_QHDYBgRNKNG61zQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568D4220.3050309@php.net>
 <CAESVnVob7SweHuHed3yx8uh4hBKtW9+=p9_eX6cgsbGBEAKYfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E.99.21755.1B96D865@pb1.pair.com>
Message-ID: <568D6CD3.90206@eliw.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:36:51 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E.99.21755.1B96D865@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="jX2lfhsfWHt1EGRi5xVmVc3LPbnR6mfnO"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: eli@eliw.com (Eli)

--jX2lfhsfWHt1EGRi5xVmVc3LPbnR6mfnO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 1/6/16 2:23 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sara Golemon wrote:
>>> So, I'm all for a mediation team, but no sanction, even temporary,
>>> without a
>>> public vote.
>>>
>> I'm glad you and I agree on this.
>
> There is the risk with public votes that whoever votes a particular
> way gets harassed for the way they voted. While this doesn't happen
> very much in technical discussions, I think there's a greater risk of
> that in a vote on whether to sanction a person for unacceptable behavio=
ur.

FWIW, there are two variations of the definition of 'public vote'.   I
believe that the main context here, is that the 'details at that point
would be brought up publicly', so that everyone would be able to review
the report/details, and then vote upon the sanction.

That does not have to imply (though it can).  That the actual ballots of
that vote, would be necessity be required to be public themselves.   And
I can see pros/cons that could be argued either way there.

If ... the information is made public at that point, but the ballots are
kept in private, then that alleviates your concern there Andrea.

Eli

--=20
|   Eli White   |   http://eliw.com/   |   Twitter: EliW   |



--jX2lfhsfWHt1EGRi5xVmVc3LPbnR6mfnO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlaNbNMACgkQUTBVzmoxCKKTiACfYhJdYuzQDW35XQ6WlrUSLsdM
wj4Aniaz4bsMQUrwylQdzZKJvm/JHi4i
=2s+5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jX2lfhsfWHt1EGRi5xVmVc3LPbnR6mfnO--