Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90214 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71247 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2016 19:05:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2016 19:05:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.44 mail-lf0-f44.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.44] ([209.85.215.44:35822] helo=mail-lf0-f44.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B5/28-21755-7856D865 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:05:43 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c192so142519869lfe.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:05:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8UiarDXsfHn8SenubBAzPqHhat7r8A9iX6sW9Wofvec=; b=nTYOmJly/0DCe8DDc6ftCkO3+WqDw+TtWhM/AyG63FozlurlW64xj0AQFNjXViyOF4 1pW/UhQVlh5W7B+WhwxeC49+dcyqfjMyJVI8UqW0/od3BYUPk/I/Z99AtXcFCwGYLbpr /a85a45chFUwcSjFCONSK4SQLirkIl8QjoiELwbs+e2xoJ2S+cj0SxOhAuiTVwSWz0aB jmq6Pi6A8Gi8DuAu00jwUtD7B1Ff/+3Iy0nDvkaLOOnn12u0eet/SNf1X6pUiKiq+jvX Pzj4BCofsaFUGOWaCcZuD0fsWJlwJ3ox0uNEtJbKsvz9YnS6zOOvmgWhXKO6ASBa9wfo ycOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8UiarDXsfHn8SenubBAzPqHhat7r8A9iX6sW9Wofvec=; b=NBsn5N8iaibwHSSYNbwiJASXVVIr3SB7oKJaMxxE7jl/ZRlUM6WaaGECzBRSYLVnrC llm1FTT3IND1TGv+KgmROB6Ql3/0rHco+C3veMtfjG61Yx9Swwp31w+TCyehjvuGbu5I H7lbdat56YpGXspFkq60B3zhzD/u7Kck1w9LUoj02GPvDygdFBMbcBrFs2ITM3tUkA9d eeqU+vbGNrLy10lWk14Gmb77hfNJGN0eaWNNNANeBgOARQOfEwlFwAQ4/KGkxlEpfIjP WSh8mFqycUBK7d0VVZ7pWjgr/LnBAeBMe4oPQVcGcFdNRiFAz33z1a/VASvz/w3QDjXk FO3A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl08DQXxGLH/WEyylsxEAxPLk8w3X3oTR2xI03zmTji6uCAaIWxy2eMu1mpHBanTLy4AXRdTBMlGs8gkLPkG2BXLhTA6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.83.193 with SMTP id h184mr16079881lfb.6.1452107140185; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:05:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.112.37.44 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:05:40 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [199.201.64.2] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:05:40 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: u_F8FvksEupr7mHIa2lZheowu6w Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Normalize token_get_all() output (with flag) From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Sara Golemon wrote: >> Maybe TOKEN_ASSOC? Since it provides associative array elements (as >> opposed to the current indexed array behavior) > > I like that one. > Have updated the RFC accordingly. I've also renamed the 'token' field in the subarray to 'id' because everytime I write an example, I end up finding myself with expressions like token_name($token['token']) because it makes perfect sense to call your subarray $token (e.g. foreach(token_get_all(...) as $token)) so... too many tokens, amirite? -Sara