Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90172 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45231 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2016 23:53:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2016 23:53:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.215.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.215.10 mail.experimentalworks.net Received: from [217.114.215.10] ([217.114.215.10:49420] helo=mail.experimentalworks.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/64-21755-9875C865 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:53:48 -0500 Received: by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D675D4185A; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:53:51 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on km31408.keymachine.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Received: from [192.168.2.34] (ppp-93-104-0-80.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.0.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: johannes@schlueters.de) by mail.experimentalworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31CE841857; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:53:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1452038018.6803.5.camel@kuechenschabe> To: Ferenc Kovacs Cc: Stanislav Malyshev , "internals@lists.php.net" Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:53:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <568C400E.6090404@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-psIpIo582sa/hXMtTNyX" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) --=-psIpIo582sa/hXMtTNyX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 23:49 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > that something which resonates with what Sara said and similar in nature > what we do with security@, point of contact, with trustworthy people > experienced on the topic and without any additional privileges apart of > being able to seeing the reports and being able to discuss the reported > problem and escalate if necessary. I think there is a difference - security@ recipient list is more or less unknown (maybe we might make it more public, but please don't sidetrack this discussion) As written before[1] I think a better approach is to list individuals which can be contacted. Maybe the accused is on that list and shouldn't receive the complaint directly. In that linked message I mentioned "guidance for new comers" thee the Drupal CoC might indeed be a good starting point by, while I just scrolled over it. johannes [1] http://news.php.net/php.internals/90041 --=-psIpIo582sa/hXMtTNyX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJWjFeCAAoJEH3sTmn8nIPXW6UIAO8naLqWgHWKqOBegQuEDpGk wJqCsvLKjIRv6Wb1Valmuu+kb/yMACG/9VefEZ3uKWa96hkKMbc2N+d9vKJFn5BD 78sP6xd7tLT9hXvjYT3bHifJj/8kTlBUqPTENqh678HISvlVpoirLgqhaC4mgzA2 5JMFA8xVwjPVVxKdz3BRIAvr1zMSqsBWVSSFBiAzdtvr/1Q/Kp9zwRaSFOO6t+yG Dacnp+slHNKQVbJRaRKt3nLqay83iJ30IPziJ3U5PcAYW6SC03mvmHzt7u076Siu S6luJXEbeYUleSz3/wb8GKwI/yhikm/Y8+S4x4+DxOkRtf/J1Qey+KzVwyCDMms= =E5hp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-psIpIo582sa/hXMtTNyX--