Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90115
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain garfieldtech.com from 66.111.4.28 cause and error)
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAAyV7nFbngZ42qzbSFyveH+vsyir9QNtMJq8H=u9VqTBVBv5Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> <568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com>
 <CAEZPtU6oKG1aHWCb2YUFXPv5bU1E16w__QDZ2HmV-q_KRSceqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <568B1041.1060601@gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU7dpgh65Nzs61wPmckvPx4sfT4y+8P3fAfJoLyQfb5mxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <568B1DA8.3060908@gmail.com>
 <CADajX4Aur47K4_TnkhScUw6RfA+1LMoDi3JKT9zc0oGJ0EiaAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <a94b087e3efebf4e8948b79d19d1f565@mail.gmail.com> <568BD0CA.7040909@php.net>
 <CAEU6NAeX+PXGOYVc-EE0P5y-LmfG8OsmLzhSNLqHDhSvkTcQmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <568BE845.2090102@php.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601051607280.4541@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
 <CAEZPtU5T6HnbmNYu0qHBax0SoS+OxnutZZ=fWTquRJt5=pom0g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <568BFF63.3080403@garfieldtech.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:37:39 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU5T6HnbmNYu0qHBax0SoS+OxnutZZ=fWTquRJt5=pom0g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: larry@garfieldtech.com (Larry Garfield)

On 1/5/16 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> Anyway, I don't say that it cannot happen, I just say that, AFAIK, we
>>> never got such concerns in the PHP community.
>> Sorry - not true. I can name several issues from various PHP related
>> conferences. Although not directly under the "control" of the PHP
>> developers team (and hence not influenced by a proposed CoC), they're
>> certainly part of the community.
> Same here. And in the core as well. Even relatively recently.
>
> I would love to see more focus on how to make this out in a fork we can all
> agree on instead of arguing about the rights of one or the other, all
> parties will have the same rights. Or to argue about whether such bad event
> can happen or not. It will too late to do it when it will happen again.
> This alone is a good enough reason to do it, now.
>
> About anonymity, it is also critical during the whole investigation and
> afterwards. The reasons are rather obvious for both parties and have been
> explained here.
>
> A quick but well thought reaction is vital. In case of an harassment, the
> group can take measure and "officially" request to stop any private contact
> with the victim. Whether the accused person is guilty or not is not
> relevant at this stage. It will help to protect both parties.
>
> I am also convinced that we need one  now more than ever before. Not
> because we have more issues (or less) but because we are in a position now
> to actually setup such CoC in a good way. And we are also the leading web
> programming language. We must ensure that we act accordingly. I also trust
> us to have the structure to manage such situations in a fair manner.
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre

Who would like to be connected with the Drupal people in this space, if 
I can get their time?  I figure Anthony and Stas are good to include 
there (proposer and someone with well-reasoned concerned). One or two 
more people?

-- 
--Larry Garfield