Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90100
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain benramsey.com from 209.85.160.170 cause and error)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_59C8A5E3-21BB-4AE8-AC01-287A752060A6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
In-Reply-To: <63D5D55E-76A0-4550-97E8-98CC7DE9DDD3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:55:25 -0600
Cc: Michael Cullum <m@michaelcullum.com>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <B5264AB1-7E87-4779-B4B7-65A818E65EDF@benramsey.com>
References: <CAAyV7nFbngZ42qzbSFyveH+vsyir9QNtMJq8H=u9VqTBVBv5Og@mail.gmail.com> <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> <568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com> <CAEZPtU6oKG1aHWCb2YUFXPv5bU1E16w__QDZ2HmV-q_KRSceqQ@mail.gmail.com> <568B1041.1060601@gmail.com> <CAEZPtU7dpgh65Nzs61wPmckvPx4sfT4y+8P3fAfJoLyQfb5mxw@mail.gmail.com> <568B1DA8.3060908@gmail.com> <CADajX4Aur47K4_TnkhScUw6RfA+1LMoDi3JKT9zc0oGJ0EiaAQ@mail.gmail.com> <568B210A.9050103@gmail.com> <CAAqcDMgJdt-dSg8xzpPz7sObrosCFh49nMOX+4AgqYbzsCDVSA@mail.gmail.com> <A3C2C7EF-66C9-4FD4-B4E7-086C8C362DDF@gmail.com> <CAEYWF=7NjuuVRzkxa0bZGeKc4heYWbFCNR59PFVLH96hTyRdUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAqcDMg8BRBu91cz=PzamYeMMJS8fQ2y+4i5EiCfmCYLrZv6Dg@mail.gmail.com> <63D5D55E-76A0-4550-97E8-98CC7DE9DDD3@gmail.com>
To: Paul Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: ben@benramsey.com (Ben Ramsey)

--Apple-Mail=_59C8A5E3-21BB-4AE8-AC01-287A752060A6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> If there's an accusation, then *due process* needs to be applied. If =
it rises to the level of needing *due process* then the police should be =
involved. There's no need, *none at all*, for a star chamber *or* a mob =
to be an amenable authority to salve someone's hurt feelings and ban =
someone else, not even in a temporary capacity.

Isn=E2=80=99t this RFC setting up the due process?

If you harass someone at work, there are review processes and you get =
fired. In fact, in most states, you don=E2=80=99t need a reason to get =
fired. You just get fired. They don=E2=80=99t call the police unless =
they need to press charges for a criminal offense.

Why shouldn=E2=80=99t a public open source project set up rules and =
processes for =E2=80=9Cfiring=E2=80=9D someone from the project if they =
harass someone?

-Ben

--Apple-Mail=_59C8A5E3-21BB-4AE8-AC01-287A752060A6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREIAAYFAlaL53IACgkQsC2XmJyMBxss7wD/S3qaN6go56Stjqy5278e3PFh
Q7DtquQ54zSjE4bc10kA/iQ5SFSwQlpUJ3iXctto/zZrzRZImQ+nthD37tjKRcTQ
=b5F4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_59C8A5E3-21BB-4AE8-AC01-287A752060A6--