Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90051
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.193 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <10889178-A15C-4B28-85CC-C1E5AB08E952@gmail.com>
References: <CAAyV7nFbngZ42qzbSFyveH+vsyir9QNtMJq8H=u9VqTBVBv5Og@mail.gmail.com>
	<568AE803.1080209@gmail.com>
	<568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com>
	<CAEZPtU6oKG1aHWCb2YUFXPv5bU1E16w__QDZ2HmV-q_KRSceqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<568B1041.1060601@gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7dpgh65Nzs61wPmckvPx4sfT4y+8P3fAfJoLyQfb5mxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<568B1DA8.3060908@gmail.com>
	<CADajX4Aur47K4_TnkhScUw6RfA+1LMoDi3JKT9zc0oGJ0EiaAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<568B210A.9050103@gmail.com>
	<CAAqcDMgJdt-dSg8xzpPz7sObrosCFh49nMOX+4AgqYbzsCDVSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<A3C2C7EF-66C9-4FD4-B4E7-086C8C362DDF@gmail.com>
	<CAEYWF=7NjuuVRzkxa0bZGeKc4heYWbFCNR59PFVLH96hTyRdUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<10889178-A15C-4B28-85CC-C1E5AB08E952@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:00:04 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7oGLr0VScRHcFPuqmgv=+oZuiaKMvptk7iy_AuVZ56wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com>
Cc: Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net>, Michael Cullum <m@michaelcullum.com>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 4, 2016, at 21:22, Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net> wrote:
>>
>> Every long standing collaborative system adopts, uses, and sheds rules of conduct to suit its real and perceived challenges.
>
> Including the one headed by Linus Torvalds, right? (/me rolls eyes)
>
> I don't know which is worse: that this is being discussed in the first place, or that there are so many willing volunteer speech police around to support it.

What is worst is seeing someone using an example of a person referring
to abortions, sexual comments related to "stop the breed" and other
disgusting things as an example of why we should not have a CoC. That
and the fascist comparison makes me wonder a lot about his values. May
I suggest you to bring constructive arguments into the game instead? I
got what you consider as a limitation of free speech. I think many
already explained why it is not about free speech but protection and
about confirm and ensure a safe context, given you understand what
"safe" means here. Hopefully.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org