Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90044 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73224 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2016 02:59:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2016 02:59:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pmjones88@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pmjones88@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pmjones88@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.175 mail-io0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.175] ([209.85.223.175:33207] helo=mail-io0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/EA-07292-2913B865 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:59:31 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q21so173985112iod.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:59:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZMcXGxyWi57QPf4xjnpztfNuYxN2bXGU5pW6QsD0v7g=; b=M1eBkIFiZvKvZnoVB4hcuuP40TPXhDLxvQctBdvX05rI6gk6pkLlBgli+V02FxXNP0 5AzBlG5T9sDf6dynityXtKnXvgdhdKNiK2c2KUcBxAX2ZKJlyHa+nuqRoIf1mjQKPsMU TrAeX/UXk3zCYJLh+S/wajcy8KC43K/Db/AtxRzQEWBXNQjJDGY2cEK8gBEn3eldsos+ PARDRfH1he5GUo7Bzwp5dpZ1umRHiSO3XvXDYjbiJZMEchLzybeSm8SQ7waPiaU3MZPN 3gBbSoNGG4EZ38AlBduDxkXnma9Waf3TYfvjHEIcXNkJNgK/LOAdsf745vZOMw+mftso T/DA== X-Received: by 10.107.164.141 with SMTP id d13mr89835857ioj.88.1451962768293; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ronin.attlocal.net ([2602:306:bdf1:d380:74b9:2be7:c0f9:3618]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z138sm12407626iod.37.2016.01.04.18.59.26 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:59:27 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:59:24 -0600 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> <568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com> <568B1041.1060601@gmail.com> <568B1DA8.3060908@gmail.com> <568B210A.9050103@gmail.com> To: Michael Cullum X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: pmjones88@gmail.com ("Paul M. Jones") > On Jan 4, 2016, at 20:31, Michael Cullum wrote: >=20 > Huge +1 to this for the reasons stated both by Eli about why it should > exist, and the reasons mentioned by Ferenc in that it's not giving out = new > powers, but adding accountability to the use of those powers. I do = think > however there is some fine tuning that could be done. >=20 > 1) When a summary report is posted, the offender should be given the The "offender"? Not "the accused", not "the alleged offender", not "the = presumed innocent until proven guilty", but "the offender". *This* is = why the RFC is awful, horrible, anti-free-speech, etc. It abides no = concept of liberty to speak. The RFC is virtue-signaling for a particular political persuasion, and = nothing more. It does serve one useful purpose: to help identify who wants to be an = authoritarian and shut down speech from others. --=20 Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php