Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90022 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21595 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2016 00:37:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2016 00:37:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.47 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.47 mail-pa0-f47.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.47] ([209.85.220.47:33857] helo=mail-pa0-f47.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6E/33-07292-5401B865 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:37:25 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id uo6so185555591pac.1 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:37:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WDc7BxAcWCaXDwQfkwC8n0H5Gjpm1PZa/W7z6oac1x0=; b=AnD1aWZPa4f1FdWj8VDtR+q+l3LNhCDXIaozb7yoJRIUlntvlc3SzsqmFFqzOCpRwE 9tWW7K+48FTOonlEcGLoIX//eR+xzcpiAvd2CRhY9yeA7stB+OdSctno1RrX5XxEFCtY XLFSdOrlcCKda17RY/3Nvwu5B26jiV6MO5lVSEeGpMo7IUwj8doyyU4EVi8Fcfe85KZR UJjKPjW5D8F/kJwp0MIApKUurjnveSKUUD9eeWCZiDUEw6RnWeHAtaUBczcmJhA69bfz g+sQmQ6ppm7mbeJ/WTOj8qE7e5En4zqEywmqL1NfYHwTZ8aePZs5tAGJHaw2D7YpBhtm l7OQ== X-Received: by 10.66.161.70 with SMTP id xq6mr129349419pab.73.1451954242495; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from Stas-Air.local ([205.154.255.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm123571030pfi.94.2016.01.04.16.37.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:37:21 -0800 (PST) To: Pierre Joye , Eli References: <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> <568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com> Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <568B1041.1060601@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:37:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > The effort to create and adopt a CoC is minimal and the benefits are > huge. It creates, confirms or ensure that the context of the php.net > remains a safe for anyone to contribute. It also provides a way for 5 (or, since CoC mechanisms are not specified at all, even 3 assuming CoC decides by majority) people to accuse any member of the community of some pretty dark things (without even having to provide any substantial proof) and immediately ban them from all the community spaces with no ability to explain or counter. I don't think this is a good idea, especially when nobody actually thinks we need such draconian measures for anything at all that actually happened. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com