Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90019 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13930 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2016 00:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2016 00:21:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=eli@eliw.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=eli@eliw.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain eliw.com designates 69.195.222.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: eli@eliw.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.195.222.200 mx-mia-3.servergrove.com Received: from [69.195.222.200] ([69.195.222.200:52534] helo=mx-mia-3.servergrove.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 05/E1-07292-29C0B865 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:21:40 -0500 Received: from [69.195.222.125] (port=55262 helo=smtp2.servergrove.com) by mx-mia-3.servergrove.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1aGFNX-0001LL-UZ for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:21:35 +0000 Received: from [69.136.226.104] (port=57261 helo=[192.168.1.123]) by smtp2.servergrove.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aGFNX-0000WR-RG; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:21:35 +0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> Message-ID: <568B0C8E.3080206@eliw.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:21:34 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568AE803.1080209@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCnqgiNsS4qmI1UAon8q8ixjRuS35GKo1" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct From: eli@eliw.com (Eli) --bCnqgiNsS4qmI1UAon8q8ixjRuS35GKo1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/4/16 4:45 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Looks to me like solution in search of a problem. I'm with PHP project > since 90s, and maybe it is my biased view As someone who originally was hesitant to do something similar with his conferences. I can speak that the reason for such a proposal is not "because we have a problem". It's a pro-active step, which makes it clear to people who are not a part of our community at the moment, when they happen to approach our community, and perhaps, are interested/intrigued about joining it. That yes, it will be a safe environment for them to do so. Without such a statement. They would have no way to determine that, other than reading 10 years worth of internals+reddit+etc. To that end, it's a great step, and I will +1 vote for it when it comes up. Thanks for putting it forward Anthony. Eli --=20 | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW | --bCnqgiNsS4qmI1UAon8q8ixjRuS35GKo1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlaLDI4ACgkQUTBVzmoxCKK2vACgiOYQqcYeYg1PIbvcvGXUZfjA TIEAniJJjJsPXeYPmfCqj0/p4qbs1KIw =D/JB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCnqgiNsS4qmI1UAon8q8ixjRuS35GKo1--