Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90002 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68050 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2016 20:27:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2016 20:27:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.215.65 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.65] ([209.85.215.65:33614] helo=mail-lf0-f65.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/3A-07292-6A5DA865 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:27:19 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id y184so28985769lfc.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:27:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=agL4QNjlQ5kkxCSZXSf02Nd6OZf9be5Tv2H3OnL44Rg=; b=U9zTOijTBZP4wNob0nYfyODAQVWexP+0ynIZePuLTbbFiSyHFLq+0OUty6Wr+ZeSTu wPnsAtI5dKMUYPaOfs5etV6vM+9Cno+8C8vj33tQnNKP4zAR00Dv7AZQ+hgOCYKMA41j vetFQKlH/U5FFR+jSHmyzbYOYVdcggTb8RZtM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=agL4QNjlQ5kkxCSZXSf02Nd6OZf9be5Tv2H3OnL44Rg=; b=RQE0HXfSzZ7xoDojknBH0iRWhpdDMLxNrI3YupefUnPnVtvpnMTaczosxG8fzK7WMZ Ondjv3c7jblquOdnXMGDERh82OjpQWv5Per0TI6WzrwlLrmK3rAixAy7S5KKVymFlcDb SQB4hqvnOThj4sf9uh0VHFEMQDzwisySFjseeQybnXryW2cqUd5DUCYcWg7xJ0Z2BiY8 uS9D75pQDiMLENdi49qrfzZJiNvKGsghVv3DDI0nJGVsWRD0m3O/sNpY4tnkbdDK2o4Y XM3SL5S9FKl6RA3QUomwRP889bQdrn2FF962g0zFXWo7F+X6F8ZZizW8BlRD1nbA8IcG H0Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnayNEZf4hLRisGidQUbErZWapo6FUe7nEGbKAYAxyMoOszbZqo+SuDrL6J+0GxCp4SD8r1qcjtwQnNIJKpjb6kXKUfQg== X-Received: by 10.25.38.2 with SMTP id m2mr33084328lfm.113.1451939235704; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:27:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.25.24.210 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:26:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <15D9C342-0BF3-4476-8473-A82E858781E3@zort.net> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:26:56 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SvXMmjTr49-GVXQYiSoVsIYgY0U Message-ID: To: bishop@php.net Cc: John Bafford , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] GitHub Pull Requests Triage Team From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 1 January 2016 at 12:12, Bishop Bettini wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, John Bafford wrote: >> I think when I brought this up before, the major open discussion point >> before the thread died was what period of time constituted long enough for >> closing a waiting-on-submitter PR. 2 weeks is probably too short, but it >> seemed a reasonable minimum and something had to go into the RFC. I think 4 >> weeks is probably a better place to start. >> > > Warn at 2 weeks, close at 4? There's no real harm in closing it unmerged: > the submitter can always resubmit. This is a contribution from the cheap seats, since I don't have time to actually help, but I'm not a big fan of auto-closing contributions (at least until the branch is literally closed for bug fixes). I'm worried that it'll send a message that we don't really care about getting outside contributions, which is obviously not the case. What's the argument for auto-closing? Our stable branches are actually pretty stable, so fixes and small features aren't generally going to have merge issues that fast. Adam, who misses the days when he could read every new bug and comment.