Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89788 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72571 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2015 12:43:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 2015 12:43:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dz@heroku.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dz@heroku.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain heroku.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dz@heroku.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.51 mail-wm0-f51.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.51] ([74.125.82.51:38847] helo=mail-wm0-f51.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C7/20-05164-C6379665 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:43:25 -0500 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so23100565wme.1 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:43:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heroku-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QrRlZP/CFhqZGj5wIJXfjl8ZrgywqAGKGiREcDv/CsA=; b=a1oP2Zorrd2tcjOWDoB1pQiDO/2TER//uVx7joPHOBzA+u2EdyBFkRD+leTsVDghw3 KdDs4URxYeXz0WPWaEulhc2FIDiMe5w47ZnqojNcf8i7txh50s1XLg5Kho+Gz1EkNlXF 4xrjET5SiQB74tA5WQy1BiM6TqVGYnjogIZLCneGjFD8vVD1XOKVkObUJB972hiNhOPi 6VwabxGtFdYrPTRzL0SXdufRgFB0hRyWEKT5TvrMzktRhzUS6DIcm8J9ubONysqDtCN1 ejOBD+QqeiHzg7ufDwrZ6bXpkDb7VxjooCQ6/uG4NgfavcCqpeBL73QDRwfg44mvGmwr KoKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=QrRlZP/CFhqZGj5wIJXfjl8ZrgywqAGKGiREcDv/CsA=; b=eYz5QyWNrogv9vq5rWHzjDA17SLWJxtn5xD0RJ5PdAgrN6AZQx4V5ewD3P3/SZpxTD //9GBGz4jCRYf2BjsllXIwP0YDAcMVyhhnPZJRU+5XtihtxtRuIfGCk96bu5NQvwRR2T ip3Ec6rLIpE5E8mXx0BXJkYIBxjzhcNbMqnY8oZgSEw/PCq/h3+te+8cOfYWmm4I22df D2XYVqoo/2w6orjjeCQkJR+CswCznOAXKGDG04d4FS1oips0c2XvUKi5OA5QQidIewTY +2oSf6By1YLjQ8doep+U2JW9mBXDUNXMC6Wf/kUYYBcoMcF6D4frI062Y63VjbXYVhyo fmPA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8bvxhGVjDaeajSPylCmCqvrY1jvlxnWtQ+RCJJUc2y5V46cGon7KH/y+EUBgM7eTdJpzOC9GxFIyPlcES1Es9MyChCQ== X-Received: by 10.28.147.129 with SMTP id v123mr18524607wmd.98.1449751401634; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.19.20] (ipb21b84af.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [178.27.132.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h189sm711687wme.1.2015.12.10.04.43.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:43:20 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) In-Reply-To: <56695EFB.2090709@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:43:18 +0100 Cc: PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <56662437.5040508@lsces.co.uk> <27359E8F-2C04-416B-861D-C2C4C85E4C77@lerdorf.com> <5666CDDD.6030209@lsces.co.uk> <5667A477.1060308@gmail.com> <566855AC.30808@gmail.com> <56687ACA.5090309@lsces.co.uk> <56695BCA.9090305@telia.com> <56695EFB.2090709@lsces.co.uk> To: Lester Caine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7 From: dz@heroku.com (David Zuelke) Lester, we are software developers. not fortune tellers. Stop speculating. Gather data. Profile your stuff and look where the = bottlenecks are.=20 > On 10.12.2015, at 12:16, Lester Caine wrote: >=20 > On 10/12/15 11:02, Bj=C3=B6rn Larsson wrote: >> Just noticed that Smarty team is working on a 3.1.28 relase that = plans >> to be PHP 7 compliant, see: https://github.com/smarty-php/smarty >=20 > The version I'm running is not giving any errors, similarly ADOdb. = Both > were brought up to be clean on PHP5.4 and that seems to be the case = with > most BC problems. BUT should either of these packages need any 'major > upgrade' to take advantage of a faster PHP7? They are e_strict = compliant > and well structured so why would they not perform twice as fast on = PHP7? >=20 > --=20 > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=3Dcontact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk >=20 > --=20 > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20