Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89764
Return-Path: <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 11169 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2015 19:02:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2015 19:02:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.51 mail-wm0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.51] ([74.125.82.51:36359] helo=mail-wm0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 02/91-31749-44927665 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:02:28 -0500
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so193115620wmw.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4lPIAA5qrh42siX43zWDHG97Yy5z8inn/OJUdp49/pA=;
        b=jfdX5AZO5LIItOAGEK/2ELBvEVTQLuYq3Xl34ovp/dFDLKmyeT4JeO+QpkjbieI/Fh
         +uwfU+J/y1tO04WUHyPJ/mhCTlJzwLbx3p9VwfELOa+3dMWnK0cRWkuBjqNYzEP3gcTv
         yNAioK5nDcE44rUIZdCS3DK0o1VmBEyJuu62R4KMsABDNkx7tee0f4QeOs9hX0b7ijIK
         fBOlNOIOHUO21DrnMo+R6D/+1Es5nKmZ1S5+lm9DQDWKilgOtsUFSyEPVn9IsBFS5xF4
         zACwfsglj8ovzHs6QJ2ajp2pxWlgRw+yOcaJvwEvc+e6SSfYrRT3OdzpHBTaLpy5SFQj
         n4hA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.125.73 with SMTP id y70mr6595908wmc.95.1449601345410;
 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.226.10 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ddc2c1ef2971c608752e875e083cd3d4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0a0a70d756b14a84fc1cd19fd04bb914@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nG0amKb9C3HRURFDRC=zWvmKRqJ6Ee2tv8KZNa2O2RdBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ddc2c1ef2971c608752e875e083cd3d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:02:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nETRKjc2gxjBZE9FxJug06d1L+cZACBfUHp6pwD4To=7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

Zeev,

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:09 PM
>> To: Zeev Suraski
>> Cc: PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
>>
>> Zeev,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> > Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to
>> > extend the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any
>> > glaring omissions.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Let the discussion continue=E2=80=A6
>>
>> I'd prefer it if the RFC took a stance and made a recommendation to one =
of
>> the options.
>
> It does, perhaps not in a strong enough way:
> "Further, given the 5.6 -> 7.0 upgrade is more difficult and time
> consuming - our recommendation is option #1".
>
> I shuffled things around a bit to make it clearer.  Let me know if that
> answers your concern.

Looks much better. Thank you.

I still would rather see one vote (I have a thing against multiple
vote options in general). If it gets denied, then we could do a
different RFC with a different option.

But having the stance being recommended is a good step forward.

Thanks

Anthony