Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89762 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6487 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2015 18:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2015 18:18:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.43 mail-vk0-f43.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.43] ([209.85.213.43:35963] helo=mail-vk0-f43.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4F/C0-31749-6FE17665 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:31 -0500 Received: by vkay187 with SMTP id y187so23368433vka.3 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:18:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zend-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SBGIjpMQ5jmQksnz6CPwEmmQI+eUnNCedc4AB2rsNwk=; b=iHpIEumBnipOmiCvvslk9ULex5ea/cPYL6fCnhe+g7OVo8sFVbH78AAZJgvL/8J9D+ Zgv7HRQpP/eCJbHm78/OvtltP8+2vCiHOokf66aXieT6/+R3PCf3PTSQciYIAYserh0n MgymEitm9icx2XqbcuFjO5fuPngaT0E8hQ+U9Ci4oC8BZkROivUxzPOsG/ZJK53OCYMx 4dzWGQr77Jp2+fcVHVn98TjhciJFYBPO1fn5x2fdPtBJl1JuokKtiaLH4YLyiAqWmnMW HZ7QUCk+PTNg4PUtlutpZF7IudrEO3G5yLopnT0ufDAyXDp1FNdS3A++qVX46frZ13S0 FoJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SBGIjpMQ5jmQksnz6CPwEmmQI+eUnNCedc4AB2rsNwk=; b=hqZOn+wX/L+GRP3y6tdiwD18Z8mYopf/RRUMdbMw2QNo8TvJhcgXTWZMyqSnPAxcOM C6rkdm91KnkW+pgofFx2M6hANCMfoV5uLEZe/shdxPEXg4cdtiXxPJWfFSCz3Ed5IaKK 5e4kUKBHr2oCyYPSQ08ubcpnyZ7UV9L/w686VeHIf7Fl//QD0swbL80W60VRmKzEuoOl xXoipnPvNezMe+i1iAhPSVqd4bspH0FAWG7o77Qkqik4MrtHjZq5v2Rc8FZBy1prqHBN GpLZgvylo0ErxRCO89SrQxrTT7VmoIpSc4yre7GM5mk/tVGzR6u2wkd5ynuHjZuVNFqC YJyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMzROpg2sZstPG7mvKKZOOm9ctdlIalnAYowjG5WzUgtCG4w7GVsQjssuVMPi9f9u1ShzFczOaEyTbgQsZpojrbseGJMwnhwVGAiW2wWta3cSQZ93FqBtWHi0FBNHo8eqE2zGjKMEoGZk45Nv8SnJkzGUd3n8A2ZuzZrg7HvYLxczTQBnOR3CJ1D+zmLTzOIIT7Ro+JaKygCTktSAPf1FWuYDkGw== X-Received: by 10.31.134.3 with SMTP id i3mr969813vkd.14.1449598708517; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:18:28 -0800 (PST) References: <0a0a70d756b14a84fc1cd19fd04bb914@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQH9h+SVbTPP/WEeB2e7emvDvziBxQIzKGeUnlcfvvA= Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:18:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:11 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline > > I think you're making the voting too complicated :-) In the case that I > don't > want to extend it, I can only pick "no"... but can I still make a > preference for > +1 or +2 years? I don't really know... Technically you could, but you're not supposed to: Proposed Voting Choices: 1. Extend the lifetime of PHP 5.6 yes/no 2. -->If you chose to extend it<---, extend it to * year of Active Support + 2 years of Security Support * year of Active Support + 1 year of Security Support > Better make it a three way choice, where you just tally up the two "extend > please" votes to be over 50%? That would effectively be the same thing as it is now, if I'm understanding correctly. I'm fine with either approaches. Zeev