Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89673 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93349 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2015 23:08:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2015 23:08:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=oldschooldsl@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=oldschooldsl@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: oldschooldsl@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.172 mail-lb0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.172] ([209.85.217.172:35285] helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F9/54-55814-0EFB4665 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 18:08:17 -0500 Received: by lbpu9 with SMTP id u9so7767737lbp.2 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 15:08:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/wofgSnGn2JS7IO3kZEE/Ef/D5tt99ClejzDXVeSRvU=; b=yps1RMMxyevpIpfPXHQSYnqBLubvtFj0Z5jhAp1EwxWDt44TIns0htV/MbypmWGdQf UeFXBV7CxWhfDRvy7/JgGNnZjvTdpgT9x9E6Qj4FVS7HQDVogVQ7dBPFxtO77NyxWtei bW4rZap8KbA+RE2XsYaqNalITu1pOSH2vjmQGRgMfcGx6iG0bDXqhdlP0Mvn0EAiktjd 4gkm/mtXWDMM2p4A4s+h6s/J4trqowPL/xkpgi3m6oAamzYSLPTUeuIRj8hYbaBGTGhc /Vj2PFw6+dhiZSUtVqYJnwzzL/nBE3vLZX0CqZvP+gcWcEMpHEFkoJSj9lY8XytkWc+C 29xQ== X-Received: by 10.112.166.33 with SMTP id zd1mr10381518lbb.113.1449443292949; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 15:08:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.33.68 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:07:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5664B8D3.8030003@php.net> References: <566485DD.7010504@garfieldtech.com> <012901d1305d$aa68ed30$ff3ac790$@belski.net> <5664B8D3.8030003@php.net> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 18:07:53 -0500 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= Cc: Anatol Belski , Larry Garfield , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c37c549933e5052642d065 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 life cycle From: oldschooldsl@gmail.com (Adam Howard) --001a11c37c549933e5052642d065 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 8 months is fine. It is more than enough time for people to upgrade and adapt. Extending support longer only extends the excuse for other developments not to upgrade and adapt, as history has proven time and time again. On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre = wrote: > Le 06/12/2015 20:38, Anatol Belski a =C3=A9crit : > >> Virtually, most of the core devs are concentrated on improving and >> bringing forward 7. That means what is called "active development" doesn= 't >> really match the reality, per fact. >> > > That's 'active support', not 'active development'. It means that we accep= t > every bug reports, even not security-related. If we extend the > security-only period, the support of the whole 5.x for non-security-relat= ed > bugs stops in 8 months. Easier for us but too short for users IMHO. > > Regards > > Fran=C3=A7ois > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --001a11c37c549933e5052642d065--