Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89672 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89968 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2015 22:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2015 22:37:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:10071] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F2/F3-55814-9B8B4665 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 17:37:46 -0500 Received: from [192.168.100.124] (unknown [82.240.16.115]) (Authenticated sender: flaupretre@free.fr) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 169464B0064; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:36:40 +0100 (CET) To: Anatol Belski , 'Larry Garfield' , internals@lists.php.net References: <566485DD.7010504@garfieldtech.com> <012901d1305d$aa68ed30$ff3ac790$@belski.net> Message-ID: <5664B8D3.8030003@php.net> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:38:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <012901d1305d$aa68ed30$ff3ac790$@belski.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 life cycle From: francois@php.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Laupretre?=) Le 06/12/2015 20:38, Anatol Belski a écrit : > Virtually, most of the core devs are concentrated on improving and bringing forward 7. That means what is called "active development" doesn't really match the reality, per fact. That's 'active support', not 'active development'. It means that we accept every bug reports, even not security-related. If we extend the security-only period, the support of the whole 5.x for non-security-related bugs stops in 8 months. Easier for us but too short for users IMHO. Regards François