Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89659
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH4_NWEt8WzEhsh1f1SLFnG-NUSJ_BeiSoMP7FsQ2PRpkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d7986bddhrs5d7o2c6r42g6h9to3au5kq0@4ax.com>
	<CAH-PCH4_NWEt8WzEhsh1f1SLFnG-NUSJ_BeiSoMP7FsQ2PRpkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 18:02:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-DCWVNyk+3u-f4drdmh8PbJiip4q=vM775HiTjKFimsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11416e140a43f605263db6a3
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.6 life cycle
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--001a11416e140a43f605263db6a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2015. dec. 6. 13:15 ezt =C3=ADrta ("Jan Ehrhardt" <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>):
> >
> > See http://php.net/supported-versions.php
> >
> > Will PHP 5.6 go into 'security fixes only' on 28 Aug 2015 with a end of
> > life on 28 Aug 2016? Or will we be postponing this a couple of months?
> >
> > BTW: An end-of-life in Dec 2016 will be in line wih the EOL of OpenSSL
> > 1.0.1: "Version 1.0.1 will be supported until 2016-12-31."
> > http://openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html
> > --
> > Jan
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
> Since the rfc for 5.7 failed the voting I've personally assumed that we
> don't want to support the 5.x series after the normal lifecycle for 5.6:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php57
>
> Most of my arguments for 5.7 was the same as Zeev and orhers listed here =
in
> this thread but the majority shared the opinion that the support left for
> 5.6 is sufficient and we shouldn't prolong the support for 5.x as it will
> just delay the adoption for 7.0
>

I can't say anything as to what majorities think, but while I did not want
a PHP 5.7 release, with the large amount of additional work and
fragmentation of focus it would have implied, this does not make me adverse
to extending the PHP 5.6 support cycle. I would go as far as saying that us
not having done a PHP 5.7 release is an argument in favor of prolonging
support for PHP 5.6, not the reverse.

Nikita

--001a11416e140a43f605263db6a3--