Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89595
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com designates 209.85.192.182 as permitted sender)
To: Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>,
 internals@lists.php.net
References: <039701d12dce$c67982a0$536c87e0$@lool.fr>
 <CAMUwpuS_z2Nf11edEZ7smhYZr7i9a5EcK93m0G_w8E400MSvNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <56605D5E.5050001@php.net>
 <CAH-PCH4fDkw4GejVA9s7712Ns5CmE4+zg_GJ9hxFEUh4_bBSKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6rp06btg753vjoj9hg2pbjs3p9etv31tgu@4ax.com>
 <CANUQDCh0sF_ytQ+1W=KqcRMo6UCAijv+8+MQ4o_7QLEbA7npow@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5660AA73.8090907@lerdorf.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:47:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANUQDCh0sF_ytQ+1W=KqcRMo6UCAijv+8+MQ4o_7QLEbA7npow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="lNPoK9xrmPmXRKJPKVSTdNbmqvAXfi7UT"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.0 final RTM delay
From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf)

--lNPoK9xrmPmXRKJPKVSTdNbmqvAXfi7UT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 12/03/2015 09:39 AM, Niklas Keller wrote:
> Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> schrieb am Do., 3. Dez. 2015 17:04:
>=20
> Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:27:36 +0100):
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>=

>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Julien Pauli:
>>>> We, PHP, are not distros maintainers.
>>>
>>>  Well said. But why, then, do we provide Windows binaries?
>>
>> loaded question, I think it would worth splitting the discussion into =
a
>> separate thread.
>> my understanding is that at the time when we started distributing wind=
ows
>> binaries there were no binary distributions for php windows.
>=20
> It might be less needed than before. I am compiling OpenSSL 1.0.2e for
> Windows at the moment. Guess that Anatol is doing the same.
> --
> Jan
>=20
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http:// <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>www.php.ne=
t
> <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>/ <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>unsub.php=

> <http://www.php.net/unsub.php>
>=20
>=20
> Seems like a failed release, make test doesn't work for OpenSSL 1.0.2e.=

> Heared other people have other issues on 1.0.1 as well.
>=20
> Does it work for you?

The release tarball builds fine against openssl-1.0.1k on Debian-jessie
for me. I haven't tested 1.0.2e yet. Waiting on
https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/openssl/ to get 1.0.2e.

-Rasmus



--lNPoK9xrmPmXRKJPKVSTdNbmqvAXfi7UT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlZgqnYACgkQlxayKTuqOuCongCfXyK9Jg80xI7bhC+MGLECuUrT
yWYAniOq6+NugKTHolF8b+CH3aZ3Pj6N
=EX1q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lNPoK9xrmPmXRKJPKVSTdNbmqvAXfi7UT--