Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89562 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25715 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2015 12:51:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Dec 2015 12:51:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:36127] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/54-02069-CCA30665 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:51:29 -0500 Received: from w530phpdev (pD9FD209C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.253.32.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7559C78B731; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:51:20 +0100 (CET) To: "'Zeev Suraski'" Cc: "'Sebastian Bergmann'" , References: <045401d12cd3$d7d57ff0$87807fd0$@belski.net> <565EA53F.5050507@php.net> <047301d12cdd$5e248020$1a6d8060$@belski.net> <565FD845.7090502@php.net> <005801d12da1$fc169ce0$f443d6a0$@belski.net> <011b01d12db7$8a6142b0$9f23c810$@belski.net> <64f1019d9bba7b57e1b63796e49163fb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64f1019d9bba7b57e1b63796e49163fb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:51:16 +0100 Message-ID: <015801d12dc9$4ee741f0$ecb5c5d0$@belski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQH8D4RpvZtVJlCUXbbll8gFykb12gIdDYXtAlzlH+ECVNzdfQGUkP4oAgivjb0BT9LI8wHJTX4HAZUtQFmd6p69cA== Content-Language: en-us Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.0 final RTM delay From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Zeev, > -----Original Message----- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:zeev@zend.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 1:09 PM > To: Anatol Belski > Cc: Sebastian Bergmann ; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.0 final RTM delay >=20 > > My red wine is already cooling for two days, your preferential drink > > for sure, too. The moment is big. But how human it wants ever to be, > > it is hardly applicable to the the job of delivering a release, even > > today. We should not let us to hype but do a solid delivery with > > everything that belongs to it at the current time. Acting any other > > way can get dangerous in the technical perspective and specifically > > today it would be explicitly unfair to a part of the community. Both > > things are bad. That's why I would prefer rather to keep the heads > > cold and to follow the process that is proven to deliver successful > > releases, then we can be sure others have a real reason to overhype. >=20 > Anatol, >=20 > I'm sorry, but this has nothing to do with professionalism or coolness = of wine > nor heads, and to be perfectly honest, I'm not feeling very = comfortable with the > suggestion otherwise. Your choice, while completely valid, is not an = ounce more > professional or cool headed than the alternative. >=20 > What leads me to think your choice is wrong are two things: > 1. The fact that generally speaking, binary builds are not supposed = to be a > blocker for a PHP release - which has always been about source (and = should > continue being about source). > 2. Taking into to account that we don't live in a world of machines, = but humans. > Staying cool headed is not equal as ignoring thoughts and feelings of = users. >=20 > As an extra bonus, the issue itself is hardly the material of which = delays are > supposed to be made. The official builds of PHP for the versions = that's likely to > be used by anybody who might actually be vulnerable to these issues - = 5.6.16 > and 5.5.30 - contain this (non-critical) vulnerability and to the best = of my > knowledge we're not going to be updating them. And if we are, what's = blocking > us from doing the same with 7.0.0? >=20 > Either way, I'm not going to continue convincing you. I'm not arguing = it's your > call. I was important for me to make it clear that this is not about > professionalism nor about temperature levels of any sorts. >=20 What I just wanted to say by the temperature is that I'm as human as = anyone else and hopefully allowed to hype not less than anyone else. = However there are always people who celebrate and people who serve, = those who serve have to keep the cold head. I'm serving, that's it. Hope = this explains any possible mistaking on my words. Regards Anatol