Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89539
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <565FE7D0.9020703@fedoraproject.org>
References: <DUB128-W930E1C18231D67D9FA0DE7BA060@phx.gbl>
	<045401d12cd3$d7d57ff0$87807fd0$@belski.net>
	<565EA53F.5050507@php.net>
	<047301d12cdd$5e248020$1a6d8060$@belski.net>
	<565FD845.7090502@php.net>
	<565FE7D0.9020703@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:11:25 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6i5cjdzHugr5WS0o5HsHXDgKyG6JYeynrnT+YJXJb-Tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Remi Collet <remi@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113adad4185dd50525fb9dc7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.0 final RTM delay
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a113adad4185dd50525fb9dc7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec 3, 2015 1:58 PM, "Remi Collet" <remi@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 03/12/2015 06:51, Sebastian Bergmann a =C3=A9crit :
> > Am 02.12.2015 um 09:42 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> >>> Do the Windows builds have to be available immediately when
> >>> the sources of PHP 7.0.0 are released?
> >> Yes.
>
> > I do not think that this means that the release of the source
> > tarball must wait for the availability of the Windows binaries.
>
> I agree, this can't be a blocker.
>
> But, in the past, downstream build done "before" announcement have
> allowed us to detect and don't distribute broken versions.

On spot. Exactly that.

And testing that latest openssl releases (which includes security fixes)
work well with a php release looks like a blocker to me, even more if it
only means a couple of hours.

We had cases where the delay was days not hours,  but we did not wait.

> e.g.
> - - a recent 7.0.0RC was retagged because of huge regression in the
> session management
> - - a recent 5.6 released was repackaged because of missing files in the
> "not-yet-official" archive
>
> So, waiting a "few" hours is not a really big issue.
>
> Of course, as there is a huge expectation for this version, and
> internet have already start talking about it, we should really
> announce it today.

--001a113adad4185dd50525fb9dc7--