Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89461
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 10813 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2015 09:06:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2015 09:06:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.181 mail-ob0-f181.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.181] ([209.85.214.181:36334] helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EF/55-04444-BFC18565 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:06:04 -0500
Received: by obdgf3 with SMTP id gf3so79296990obd.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:06:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=E+4RW/oe5qaZDYIUsHtBcDSKagUPdhic6ij0mNhLgZA=;
        b=fcABjQ7DVsPSVEHL+N9zrfZ8XjMCrycYHWhCV8ftdM8yCqVxDirF+FTwT2MuJJWrzN
         N0s4TlhunIo/w7VAYmvGX1betAWIqAdzqx0XPTXHMRAeoJ9LZ3m4g6oxuCRxI1K0l2Fh
         mNROIf+k5Z4BgtpslmwMt/7i5jxQEtWAPvLMgedDfZo17HcR9mL8SQnFQbqdZLrMY8v3
         nApE+2/6KN8EI7hOofdcmF7PbCG2X4nF5xbz8bKkDdo2+9fIfkdk3WwAmDsIWstmw2YU
         MNintOWdg4SqU4mlY+Fe0BtLyRvkmEi0MqIC4o4J5kNwKqbRLAmHMfrATLLry+O1hMzj
         EoiA==
X-Received: by 10.182.107.164 with SMTP id hd4mr31167824obb.74.1448615161013;
 Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:06:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.73.198 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:05:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c_pVFVbzqThuPg1V3VDTV-7Ci4O6T6hNtY5XPgVb2Mt-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c_pVFVbzqThuPg1V3VDTV-7Ci4O6T6hNtY5XPgVb2Mt-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:05:21 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FkGAWoOJQ-FJx8hS7SKdoMnKO28
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXbs3GDj2ux1sQm_R0Xy=YBvEEzTiuSYbr1thw1YcZZD+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net>, 
	Remi Collet <remi@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] HashDos protection
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

Hi Nikita,

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:
> What are your thoughts on this?

Great! This is exactly what I was thinking.
I prefer collision counting rather than slower hash function.

Hardcoded collision max (1000) seems ok for me.
Catchable fatal error, at least E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR, is preferred, IMHO.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net