Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89454 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56760 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2015 17:16:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2015 17:16:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pedronaroga@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pedronaroga@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pedronaroga@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.175 mail-yk0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.175] ([209.85.160.175:35971] helo=mail-yk0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9E/B3-35358-97E37565 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:16:41 -0500 Received: by ykdr82 with SMTP id r82so95134231ykd.3 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:16:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Scz83wkRh9ETspv8gIvUcj+Rm67fA4iv0sXNFy+9rus=; b=pSnM7kRXWG9fj9Sk9iRPcAGXRTxhqqyorfzy0EBfdaCjodfbQqg9LW5P9VNENKbcod P6KmypbPU5ghhPz92Z7lImiid9ubnJ1s3MrPsMJOPgmGdIFI1uCeUhyHSARwwxmwz8tk Fy1l0jnLVqf2NOw1BYOouqg5rb4hBT424D47K28XbcwNxRPwCUUzWl1gV9Yv9a4iQn1V TjmjQA634eJO/9Lqml1r4H8kXA6pNO4jB/MtddVSzAlLWvnFs9zpMOufASKRh3snvxv8 FmMu9IYu9trjWRmmhI6m8HdpLO1jdnM02Mr/HDU0LvMuGYPHliz/1aW5pcI2CPOQnKVO ex+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.212.17 with SMTP id w17mr520901ywd.237.1448558199176; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:16:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.202.9 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:16:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5655D82A.8020304@lsces.co.uk> <5655E4E4.8070200@garfieldtech.com> <5655E61E.3000904@gmail.com> <5655E93F.90506@gmail.com> <5655F24B.6020401@garfieldtech.com> <5655F47C.3060504@gmail.com> <1B1E6CD7-2378-43CA-A636-83383707AF8E@gmail.com> <56572AEE.9030407@gmail.com> <56573A0F.6030900@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:16:39 -0200 Message-ID: To: Levi Morrison Cc: Rowan Collins , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fd59ee60641052574bcf8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Native Annotation Syntax From: pedronaroga@gmail.com (Pedro Cordeiro) --001a114fd59ee60641052574bcf8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Levi, I was asking about the reasons it was rejected. While researching, I found the original RFC was voted with 123 votes (71% approval), and yet was marked as 'declined'. I didn't know why, couldn't find why, so I figured I'd ask (as it strikes me as a major feature that's missing). 2015-11-26 15:11 GMT-02:00 Levi Morrison : > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Rowan Collins > wrote: > > guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/2015 16:05: > >> > >> Ok then. I'll pretend that lack of interest didn't happen many other > >> situations (like http://marc.info/?t=3D144608767800001) and move on. > > > > > > It's possible that a lot of the core devs are still concentrating on > getting > > the changes in 7.0 bedded in, and have more time to discuss features fo= r > 7.1 > > in a month or two. > > At least a few are working on features of their own. > > I am curious =E2=80=93 a quick scan of this thread didn't seem to actuall= y > propose anything new. It's just discussion about same RFC that was > already rejected. Correct? > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --001a114fd59ee60641052574bcf8--