Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89450
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56572AEE.9030407@gmail.com>
References: <CAJGzsHriGp9PoYq++=CBQptFYZQiAsa+yxxN076BHxMQGD6HrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJGzsHoP5mc2_demfWM3r7exN4qLThANcbcwo9SBydGpvmB1WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5655D82A.8020304@lsces.co.uk> <CAJGzsHr3XfxRGA8DSkLzAf-8AQvJPu1GMVE30PX=ScygMPgCPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5655E4E4.8070200@garfieldtech.com> <5655E61E.3000904@gmail.com>
 <CAJGzsHp95tp9kTB14JfUmzZ_tn-1EbD1_p9MCE59GH96AX_5DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5655E93F.90506@gmail.com> <5655F24B.6020401@garfieldtech.com>
 <5655F47C.3060504@gmail.com> <CAFp73Xv_Ya97B7YmLLvZFF32BJkQxUiZo3yu+7_H9RrfefNBCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJGzsHqOyWX2pD+0D0+GuAHDVmuB+HpOxWftY_3ORJQ+-CQ4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFp73Xtv2oL+GdOhZGFGRn4DJS_X-u=ZUv5XX5o+L1=r6gq=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1B1E6CD7-2378-43CA-A636-83383707AF8E@gmail.com> <CAFp73Xsa7YF3s9caimNk4BZJ4VuXvEU=HHoU0AcfDKNSkj_w3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMT4NoNp0sBM3Y_=yWe5c-dc73vn9574OuKE-xwBjioE-niuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFp73Xu1G=Hh4V11ehcevA1MTQGuVewU2kG1ssqonHPQGEV3kQ@mail.gmail.com> <56572AEE.9030407@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:05:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFp73XtaJJjPjQy5rquM-qO947_P6NDRtikKtd-9S3ni7XtTrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0116168288223c052573be03
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Native Annotation Syntax
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

--089e0116168288223c052573be03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ok then. I'll pretend that lack of interest didn't happen many other
situations (like http://marc.info/?t=144608767800001) and move on.

I don't want to bring the patch up to date/simplify it without a clear
decision of at least be willing to discuss the patch and not reject by all
means.
I'd propose a voting as "Are you ready for Annotations yet?". Every core
developer understands (and can base their decisions) by looking at the
complexity of the old patch.

Once voting completes and IF it gets approved, I'll gladly put it up to
date for consideration and update the RFC.

[]s,

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
wrote:

> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/2015 15:14:
>
>> I haven't seen any user asking for traits
>>
>
> Just because you didn't see it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
>
> I just did a very quick search on Google for php + mixins, limited to 2007
> or earlier (long before the current Trait implementation was born), and got
> plenty of results lamenting the lack of support for horizontal reuse in PHP.
>
> See for yourself:
> https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=php+%22horizontal+reuse%22&safe=active&hl=en&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A12%2F31%2F2007&tbm=#safe=active&hl=en&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_max:12%2F31%2F2007&q=php+mixins
>
> It's a common accusation of projects like this that time was spent on X
> that should have been spent on Y, but that's nearly always a massive
> over-simplification.
>
> Let's not spend too much time worrying if specific people are interested -
> they may just be on holiday, or busy elsewhere, or just not have much to
> say until someone assembles a few more details about the proposed feature.
> Keep it constructive, lay out how you think the feature should look and
> why, what questions are still open, and see what's needed to move it
> forward.
>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rowan Collins
> [IMSoP]
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


-- 
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada

--089e0116168288223c052573be03--