Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:8942
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <20040406084242.56277.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:45:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20040406081254.53265.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <40726787.6070609@php.net>
In-Reply-To: <40726787.6070609@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Repeat question on underscore
From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine)

Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
> 
>> The current php manual has hundreds of functions with underscore in 
>> the name. Are these all going to be replaced? In which case ALL 
>> existing script has to be re-written?
> 
> No, studly caps have been adopted as a standard only for method names in 
> the OO-style API, not for the procedural API.

Thanks for that.

So it IS something that I will have to take account of when 
I start looking at moving the interbase module to a firebird 
native version. If the interbase module accesses the 
OO-style API. If it does not, then I presume that it may be 
advantageous to handle any required conversions then?

-- 
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services