Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89384 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19393 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2015 16:40:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Nov 2015 16:40:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kontakt@beberlei.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kontakt@beberlei.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain beberlei.de from 74.125.82.43 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kontakt@beberlei.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.43 mail-wm0-f43.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.43] ([74.125.82.43:36888] helo=mail-wm0-f43.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/79-57156-7E294565 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:40:08 -0500 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so34221033wmw.0 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:40:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beberlei-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nIjKZ3MoLEteEOf3IeSAIp+SwQiUd3Sppskj+Dwu6l8=; b=HZfL0Bgk0WSKOsw07omZMf01sO8Jf/7QyztVH3y6KXcideiwf7ji8o1GhHr6O7G7AA DSMcl327RsTXDHarLhDD8pvxZTuJeP7lexb1F8sTUGDNyBY2SD2txbyTJ8+NAwai4baz Xz1QG6Ep548xOCP7lAYLQ6Py5FNumvBKkbJAabSNQb6UkV43gk2OH1t99kwS9bFHQLSn 3uZxmZMkT2CWd3bLWfjMCd8z//KMflPGg6//GpCnij3630CBpyyrtm9WxlYMSc8DvAOC Tmot7jeYSzF8DAeFZc6wWk20Y6wDM0ofhk2EQTCGKVcz+vse++KzarzYQSCV4cKVaysp 8KHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nIjKZ3MoLEteEOf3IeSAIp+SwQiUd3Sppskj+Dwu6l8=; b=WDel+e0kNgIYJqOvZBJtS2bLTGAKJuEcIKiE+1C2LGqg0PNRbIsNhfpJqvTHaDRbLQ daaUCEPuL6zN6W50GIDD7CjnfoG+UKXevxoU3hA0noUNd1SeKaZpaw5i6u4ElJxRGC8I tFJf+9xD2B3xqi7PWnCUvgsfs8GrqAp1T2OIqZ33ugIEnSanLllkKc2P3l6p3fnFbkoj 4/IYljxUQKqRb2FvN0jr9ED/q8kspZNkw0RRU01YEmQ5cfj6ez0NfXFpB9+il+0fegWK m3m4FZ8fyz1tN+R4YjKBX+i4CMOBrmCiavo8o4kc1gQv9CI0BfUWGDLa6nUyb+zsJAwZ fQAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsv0WIxeBiodyHOHsgH5wyY3NxPzRXzmP3tMnF8dxYjbbmNuLiOr6C4+H+TxVVqOo3aAn6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.73.11 with SMTP id w11mr22784720wma.44.1448383204429; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.22.41 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:40:04 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.11.24.127] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:40:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Pedro Cordeiro Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b2d406635af05254bfe91 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Native Annotation Syntax From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei) --001a114b2d406635af05254bfe91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Pedro Cordeiro wrote: > Hello. > > I'd been reading some old RFCs recently, and I found two RFCs on the > subject of annotations, both by Guilherme Blanco. The first one, which > proposed a native syntax for annotations, is marked as 'declined', and I > couldn't find a discussion for it anywhere. The second one, which proposes > retrieving annotation from DocBlocks through reflection is 'inactive', with > no further explanation. > > I'd really like to see native annotation support for PHP that doesn't live > in comments. > > Is there a reason those RFCs were dropped, or was it just lack of interest? > There was a vote on the declined one from Guilherme, which was in the old mailing list style, you'd have to search the mailing ilst archives to find the thread with the discussion and voting. > > - Pedro. > --001a114b2d406635af05254bfe91--