Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89379
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: bishop@php.net
Sender: bishop.bettini@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <DUB128-W228B016631AB396522B21DBA070@phx.gbl>
References: <DUB128-W228B016631AB396522B21DBA070@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:51:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEYWF=6tbuCn8w0JyFAoKiuyGsqauDXps4NPxLgaFUST0Cw6dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anatol Belski <weltling@outlook.de>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11453158f0497f05254b529e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 7.0.0 release
From: bishop@php.net (Bishop Bettini)

--001a11453158f0497f05254b529e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Anatol Belski <weltling@outlook.de> wrote:

> a) release on 26th including all known bug fixes
> b) do RC8, assume there are no bugs, so target 10th for RTM
> c) do RC8, release on 3rd, expect there are no bugs come in
> d) continue issuing release candidates till it's stable enough (needs
> definition of stable and probably an RFC)
>
> I would really ask to reach a consent on either a) or c). IMO, the options
> b) and d) are the direct road to curbing 7.0.0.  There is no hurry to
> release just to release, but it is definitely harmful to slow down the rise.
>

The little poll I sent yesterday in response to Phil's email has an even
split.

Question: Create an RC for this count($array) fix?
Responses: 26 for, 26 against
http://poll.pollcode.com/92997454_result?v

Maybe all it says is the community is split, and we won't reach consensus.

So while I'm +1 on (c), I defer to the wisdom and guidance of our RMs. :)

--001a11453158f0497f05254b529e--