Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89332
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <034657A2-53AC-48CD-ABDD-6EB18896ABF6@lerdorf.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:00:31 +0100
Cc: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>,
 Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>,
 Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Phil Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>,
 Xinchen Hui <laruence@php.net>, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <7DEB0876-554C-4646-91D1-663D41CDDC6D@zend.com>
References: <CAAyV7nG9E-7STWq2Hpe=y5Uf0nWzGMhka+FUX1p1FVNtYNVTJQ@mail.gmail.com> <112FFBCD-8445-40BC-B92F-3A97D3E97C4C@zend.com> <CAAyV7nE0bQba3Wr2yi8FbtDfDA=8ZSFz9dbQG5uZ+eF9bick2A@mail.gmail.com> <56523F74.9040708@lerdorf.com> <06a601d125c0$99d5cfd0$cd816f70$@belski.net> <CAL=_i_kArsu2JGYtdZBa-mah+k6DL-cCWtiX16mVcTsxH3WDrw@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpdTUwvdtK+uRc386R4pceocXCsSEd9s4bu4jvH87MD-8A@mail.gmail.com> <CABDNdAG84+cW9TohGbA2r0ik5=yrHVyAd5g2wk8dKRh=LeqvPQ@mail.gmail.com> <5652D782.40601@lerdorf.com> <F037E7ED-B9B0-47DD-9B42-4EEC2B267118@php.net> <EFB1D7E4-C594-4F15-A6A0-5D8344BA8F79@lerdorf.com> <CAMUwpuQ_1Nsyj3tV_=QZBnwQ6tq-iNegRX+9xYXOsQneNVd=sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL=_i_nfhOwQ7Nvp_JCVHuz0m448Z0K03y5EuV4VKBP2Zu5Wng@mail.gmail.com> <14D843AC-792B-4537-8859-023B98127E7D@zend.com> <CAAyV7nGmdK++fLUBFJdPDfCJeVCZTNP+xnJmw=-xk+ZEQEkqGQ@mail.gmail.com> <034657A2-53AC-48CD-ABDD-6EB18896ABF6@lerdorf.com>
To: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] INDRECT in arrays causes count() to become unpredictable
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)


> On 23 =D7=91=D7=A0=D7=95=D7=91=D7=B3 2015, at 15:51, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmu=
s@lerdorf.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 15:21, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Rasmus,
>>=20
>>> I think this was mostly a PR failure on my part actually. If I/we are a b=
it more careful about how we handle similar issues and the people lurking wi=
th itchy Twitter trigger fingers would spend a bit more time looking into th=
e details we should all be able to get along and get a good launch with no c=
ontroversy on Dec.3.
>>=20
>> Sorry, but when you make a statement like:
>>=20
>>> Nobody is going to take a .0.0 and push it straight to production.
>>=20
>> THAT is more than a PR failure. That's a perspective failure.
>=20
> I still don't see anyone going straight to production with 7.0.0 unless th=
ey have been extensively testing the RCs. And if they have been extensively t=
esting the RCs then any issues in them must not be impacting them. 7.0.0 is t=
he wake up call for all the people who haven't been testing the RCs and as s=
uch it will generate more issues, regardless of how long we wait. That's why=
 I still wouldn't suggest anyone go straight to production with 7.0.0 even i=
f we delay another full year. This has nothing to do with being cavalier nor=
 having a perspective failure about anything, it has to do with being realis=
tic and pragmatic about how things work based on years of experience doing t=
his.
>=20
> Every single release in the history of PHP has been a compromise. We have R=
Cs until the set of fixes from one RC to the next is free of major issues. T=
here will always be more issues, so we have to make a release decision at so=
me point.

+1 on each and every word.

Zeev=