Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89203 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50309 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2015 11:33:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Nov 2015 11:33:14 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 178.62.40.5 ajf.me Received: from [178.62.40.5] ([178.62.40.5:17283] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/12-37356-97AC5465 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <52.12.37356.97AC5465@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net References: <01e9a162-732d-460c-b47c-e570b1e2e2b6@irsmsx151.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:33:10 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01e9a162-732d-460c-b47c-e570b1e2e2b6@irsmsx151.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 178.62.40.5 Subject: Re: Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-11-12 From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hi, lp_benchmark_robot@intel.com wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > benchmark relative change since change since current rev run > std_dev* last run baseline with PGO > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > :-( Wordpress 4.2.2 cgi -T10000 0.29% -3.67% -1.28% 6.51% > :-( Drupal 7.36 cgi -T10000 0.38% -2.03% -0.67% 2.63% > :-( MediaWiki 1.23.9 cgi -T5000 0.51% -3.19% -0.97% 3.84% > :-( bench.php cgi -T1 0.08% -16.51% -12.70% 9.68% > :-( micro_bench.php cgi -T1 0.03% -1.50% 0.10% 5.41% > :-( mandelbrot.php cgi -T1 0.31% -25.68% -18.78% -0.74% > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Huh? Sad faces across the board, as bad as -25% for one test? Did we have to change something and it inadvertently affected performance? This looks pretty bad. Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/