Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:89113 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73193 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2015 01:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Nov 2015 01:34:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:36252] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DB/DE-06223-528FF365 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:34:29 -0500 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 370AE6D2003; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:34:26 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on h1123647.serverkompetenz.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from w530phpdev (pD9FD2ADE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.253.42.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB0BF23D6162; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:34:23 +0100 (CET) To: "'Zeev Suraski'" , "'Rasmus Lerdorf'" , Cc: "'Kalle Sommer Nielsen'" , "'Ferenc Kovacs'" References: <01a501d11a59$d1cba210$7562e630$@belski.net> <563FA736.2030200@lerdorf.com> <0d6eeecb24469383eff6ac692658953f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0d6eeecb24469383eff6ac692658953f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: <020d01d11a8e$c3b014b0$4b103e10$@belski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQKIisGGB7Qzv3SD6dj69sftSiI2qQK52J5LAcexIbWc//eq0A== Content-Language: en-us Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") > -----Original Message----- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:zeev@zend.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 8:57 PM > To: Rasmus Lerdorf ; Anatol Belski > ; internals@lists.php.net > Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen ; Ferenc Kovacs = > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:rasmus@lerdorf.com] > > Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2015 9:49 PM > > To: Anatol Belski; internals@lists.php.net > > Cc: 'Kalle Sommer Nielsen'; 'Ferenc Kovacs' > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date > > > > On 11/08/2015 11:15 AM, Anatol Belski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > After doing the last evaluations in the RMs circle before going = for > > > 7.0.0 RTM preparations, we came to the conclusion that the current > > > state does not look reasonable to be packaged as the final = release. > > > > > > The RCs before RC6 was looking acceptable, which gave the reason = to > > > announce the planned RTM date on Nov 12th as final. From the = todays > > > perspective, the most of the issues discovered and fixed since RC6 > > > are still minor by themselves - 7 crashes (bug #70805 rather > > > critical), and 3 functionality regressions. However, given the > > > amount and the combination of them altogether, the state is in our > > > opinion unsuitable for starting the life cycle of the next major. > > > > > > Thus, resuming the pre-release cycle seems in our opinion the = right > > > thing to do ATM. Hence this writing to inform the community about > > > the intention and to gather the opinions. PHP 7 is still going = down > > > the home stretch and is very close to the finish, the next RC can = be > > > well the last. Though we'd better ensuring the quality as many = times > > > as needed before, instead of casually disservicing the consumers. > > > > This is the right decision. The whole point of the RC cycle is to > identify crash > > bugs like 70805. It would have been great if we had caught it = earlier, > but we > > still caught and fixed it before the release and hopefully we can > > still > get the > > final release out in November. >=20 > Thumbs up from me as well (incl. trying to get it out the door in = November if > possible). >=20 Thanks for the opinions and support. That means we're having the RC7 = this week and look forward to the final. Back to the work then :) Regards Anatol