Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88932
Return-Path: <francois@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 99153 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2015 15:18:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 24 Oct 2015 15:18:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.6 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.6 smtp6-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.6] ([212.27.42.6:29096] helo=smtp6-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id CF/34-55100-B41AB265 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:18:37 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.232.41.54])
	(Authenticated sender: flaupretre@free.fr)
	by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24BE88229D;
	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <562AD91A.6080500@php.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1510241122520.10651@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Message-ID: <562BA142.90802@php.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:18:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1510241122520.10651@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151024-0, 24/10/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: run-tests.php and dynamic extension dependencies
From: francois@php.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Laupretre?=)

Hi Derick,

Le 24/10/2015 12:56, Derick Rethans a écrit :
>
> Oh really? I thought it was :-) I think I must have hacked my local
> version and promptly forgot about it. I still think this should be
> committed.

Sorry, after investigating more, it appears that your patch *was* commited.

Now, I must find why it is not working in my case. If I find something 
to fix, I'll send a patch.

Regards

François