Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88907
Return-Path: <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 52390 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2015 16:41:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 21 Oct 2015 16:41:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.46 mail-vk0-f46.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.46] ([209.85.213.46:32872] helo=mail-vk0-f46.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 63/61-43914-F40C7265 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:41:52 -0400
Received: by vkgy127 with SMTP id y127so32353556vkg.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=po8lXi+OZ5p10KxlMGBrWgeSXEM3eVdKz1rcSF2wJck=;
        b=P+U1mehPNw40N7MbXnT0rx/zJLT+w/HJzVU+lA1msjcesPJ1cSB0QNpuoZtU0fTQvl
         gBeXwI9WhXILMap15Rj8qpPdhEvdZltgcsSLAPltvDAd7l5iRBMBO6YOgGwe3om9oUQL
         wPFJVlxSvPpx9Y9C+Z2w8KwQUx9bIgyWClGFygNp/ST4rDHbLh3nWkHlUTDQ3xy6Myec
         ghCaTQ2uZpT3RvjO1grj86rP8kMeq1XOsAlSYRyNvT45WDlBtUn1dslAFdDJGuU/3ovc
         Pr4Phj25Em5p+oBqtbIyQ7u5jtS1aY0lwMGJIwqDZWaPHnAdKCoudQm3pchcSsZc/3di
         lMOg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.108.135 with SMTP id j7mr6685408vki.81.1445445709547;
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.31.191.208 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151021161740.GA23933@3006.local>
References: <20151020173602.GA92318@3006.local>
	<CA+kxMuSRFiM7nO0xZprzzEa7KNk8Yh8bm2xsSF0Edhhcoun50A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151021161740.GA23933@3006.local>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:41:49 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YRZ2YWKI3WdXj4GbKrodKBW_zQ4
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NqUbWApfeq-E8AUZL_Purf53n53TWLLqOgUBLggfvXR-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean DuBois <sean@siobud.com>
Cc: Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

> Who decides if/when we should restart voting?

I don't believe we've ever formalized that aspect. I know in the past
sometimes RFC authors will notice something wrong and fix it, then
restart voting themselves.