Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88645 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57960 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2015 16:51:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Oct 2015 16:51:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.176 mail-lb0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.176] ([209.85.217.176:34407] helo=mail-lb0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/5B-23989-F16BE065 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:51:43 -0400 Received: by lbbmp1 with SMTP id mp1so29734319lbb.1 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0A1CFMGM40OgsTfp1ezi6Itb+T2Y+6EH7xwsPdJdX/A=; b=DhylS/pWpOFDTvgcGwQJq0oLdlaX/8mXHXt70Cpw61GZCPhPgfoUqinO9dnKuDXDFw bP+IvlcbIie4vm1Th2HfCIFFdDpijchZ3hxU6clB++SxL66jGHLR6XndhPMIYOSYvlQd 13TR/EFUiQX99FG+2lGwYhZC++Tbqm98cfolXMzt0tljl8BCpJei21XYZoZfY4pQg3kX 6UWeE8b+/2iXfXo0b2pOXcznNSLnU+KRmYSe8jWxH80URdPwNDz2Vfg8yPPJX9D1P1Aq NoGd7I8Hmpk80ZN007GssBQTk1ic9Ygzrk2tyMViPS5sM2L50r4MzPl7MSjHaMvniexq MCSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQle9h2R9CPigAU3/2cRNNPXaiLWMp++ap/23XrSVQXHRMFMfcdc2am7acDzlp+6pXzrsbg+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.150.97 with SMTP id uh1mr4771969lbb.53.1443804700431; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.112.40.133 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2620:10d:c090:180::2375] In-Reply-To: <5603A202.4070003@gmail.com> References: <28.4D.56639.BB071065@pb1.pair.com> <5603A202.4070003@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:51:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dPrZwyZQp0lcVWC-SAW5iOj2Y9w Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> As a PHP developer, I agree with the possible confusion between `->` and >> `~>`. >> `==>` is a better choice IMHO, for its similarity with Hacklang syntax, as >> said previously. > > I'm getting a feeling the RFC could be more successful if syntax was > made a choice between ~> and ==> as a voting option. > Agreed. Let's leave the bike-shedding over operators to its own topic. The binding rules are much more consequential and deserving of discussion. -Sara