Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:88630
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: bishop@php.net
Sender: bishop.bettini@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuSFP=vooMzCYMapTsis6RGBVd-T4YM9z3YuxgF3Rcj6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+kxMuSFP=vooMzCYMapTsis6RGBVd-T4YM9z3YuxgF3Rcj6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:38:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEYWF=5hdXyzhYBikLiK7iLD9kX1YYyZhdPq1oZo9AYUrOrn0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd91acc20799e0521146186
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION]: Closure from callable
From: bishop@php.net (Bishop Bettini)

--047d7bd91acc20799e0521146186
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>
wrote:

> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
> code.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
>
> Thanks to Joe and Bob for the assistance in the patch.
>

Yes, but with one question: should it be named "reflection_closure"?

(I don't like that, but:) the user-land rules [1] say it will begin with
the extension name, and the coding standards [2] say it will if it's part
of a parent set.

Maybe put it in core instead of reflection extension.  Or, since
ext/reflection doesn't have any functions, we can bypass it.


[1]: http://php.net/manual/en/userlandnaming.rules.php
[2]: https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/CODING_STANDARDS#L110

--047d7bd91acc20799e0521146186--